Mueller's Opening Statement: 'My Testimony Will Necessarily Be Limited'
"Given my role as a prosecutor, there are reasons why my testimony will necessarily be limited," Mueller said in his opening statement.
July 24, 2019 at 08:51 AM
4 minute read
Robert Mueller, the former special counsel, said Wednesday in his opening statement at the House Judiciary Committee that the “facts and the law” drove his investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
“Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today,” Mueller said in his opening statement.
He added: “It is unusual for a prosecutor to testify about a criminal investigation, and given my role as a prosecutor, there are reasons why my testimony will necessarily be limited.”
Mueller, previewing testimony he described as “limited,” said he would not summarize the results of his two-year investigation in a different way Wednesday.
“As I said on May 29: the report is my testimony. And I will stay within that text,” Mueller said.
He said he would not comment on the actions of U.S. Attorney General William Barr and the actions of Congress.
Mueller's appearance Wednesday at two House committees—first at Judiciary and then at Intelligence—is widely expected to grip Washington, if not parts of the country. In the run-up to the appearances, there was extensive coverage about whether and how Mueller might veer from the boundaries of his report to offer insight and analysis on what his team discovered.
Mueller is appearing reluctantly, having said in May that his report is his testimony and that he would not speak about any matter that wasn't addressed in his report. Democrats have been urged to press Mueller on whether—despite his silence—he thinks Trump tried to obstruct the two-year investigation.
Wilmer Hale partner Jonathan Yarowsky reportedly helped prepare Mueller for his Capitol Hill appearances, which come more than a month after the special counsel released a 448-page report showing instances where the president, in the view of former prosecutors, tried to obstruct the ongoing investigation. Yarowsky was seated behind Mueller at the start of the judiciary committee proceedings.
Mueller is appearing with Aaron Zebley, who formerly worked with Mueller at the FBI as his chief of staff and who later became a partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. Zebley was among several lawyers at Wilmer Hale, where Mueller had been a partner, to join the special counsel's team in 2017.
Mueller hasn't announced his post-Justice Department plans, but several of his former prosecutors have snagged posts at major U.S. law firms. Jeannie Rhee, a former Wilmer Hale partner, recently announced she was taking a partnership at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Another prosecutor, Zainab Ahmad, has joined the New York office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
Mueller's prepared statement is posted below:
||
Read more:
The Big Questions, and Curbed Expectations, Lawyers Have for Robert Mueller
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250