Judge Carl Nichols Is Assigned to Trump's Bid to Keep NY Tax Returns Secret
The former WilmerHale partner and clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas was assigned Friday to Trump's new lawsuit. Nichols was confirmed to the bench in May.
July 26, 2019 at 09:22 AM
5 minute read
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols in Washington, the most recent trial judge confirmed to the bench, was assigned Friday to preside over President Donald Trump's bid to prevent a U.S. House committee from obtaining his New York state tax returns.
The assignment came less than 24 hours after U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden spurned the president's attempt to put the case in his court. McFadden is presiding over a case the House filed against the Treasury Department and IRS, and Trump's lawyers had designated the new lawsuit as “related” to the pending one.
Nichols, like McFadden, was appointed by Trump to the federal trial court. A former Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr regulatory partner, Nichols was confirmed in May. The former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, during the 1997-1998 term, was earlier a leading U.S. Justice Department appellate lawyer before joining WilmerHale.
This week, Trump's lawyers at Consovoy McCarthy had urged McFadden to quickly block the House Ways and Means Committee from obtaining copies of the president's New York state tax returns under a new law that permits state authorities to share the tax filings of top government officials on a request from a U.S. congressional committee.
At a hearing Thursday, McFadden said the two tax-returns suits were not “related” and Trump's new case would be reassigned randomly to another judge. McFadden, quoting language from an unrelated 2000 case, said he was mindful of trying “to avoid the appearance of judge-shopping or favoritism in assignments and to assure that cases were assigned on an impartial and neutral basis.”
New York state lawmakers said at the time the law was passed, just a few weeks ago, that the move would allow greater cooperation between state and federal officials. Trump, despite vowing for months on the campaign trial that he would release his tax returns, has refused to do so. Trump was the first presidential candidate in modern times not to release tax returns.
Trump's lawyer William Consovoy argued that the House Ways and Means Committee, acting under the New York state law, called the Trust Act, could request Trump's tax returns “at any time, with no notice to the president. And New York could respond to the request nearly instantaneously, mooting the president's ability to object before his tax records are disclosed.”
Consovoy claimed Congress has no legitimate legislative interest in the president's tax records. He also challenged the constitutionality of the Trust Act, arguing it was enacted this month to “discriminate and retaliate against President Trump for his speech and politics,” in violation of the First Amendment.
House lawyers contend that the committee's consideration of seeking Trump's state tax returns is “immune from challenge through the court system.” The House Democrats have not yet formally requested the state tax returns from New York.
“Mr. Trump's complaint and his emergency application brazenly request that this Court violate the separation of powers and enjoin the Ways and Means Committee from even embarking on legislative activity squarely within its Article I powers,” Douglas Letter, the House general counsel, said in a court filing.
Trump's lawsuit initially landed in McFadden's court because he is presiding over a separate case in which the House has sued the Treasury Department and IRS for copies of the president's federal tax returns. In that case, the IRS has refused to comply with a House Ways and Means subpoena seeking federal returns between 2013 and 2018. Federal law requires the IRS to furnish—on request by the Ways and Means Committee—the tax returns of any private citizen.
The lawsuits related to Trump's tax returns are among several in Washington and New York courts that seek financial records tied to the president. Trump's attorneys lost two bids recently to block House committee subpoenas seeking records from Mazars USA, the president's longtime accounting firm, and from his primary lender, Deutsche Bank.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute readNY Antitrust Investigators Seek Subpoena in Probe of Potential Capital One-Discover Merger
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250