California Bar 'Inadvertently' Reveals Essay Topics Days Before Exam
The bar did not respond to questions about why the essay topics were included in an email to law school leaders. One professor says the errant disclosure "should have little, if any, impact" on any test-taker's likelihood of passing the exam this week.
July 28, 2019 at 01:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The California State Bar “inadvertently” revealed to law school deans the essay topics that will be covered on this week's bar exam, the bar told registered test-takers in an email Saturday night.
The bar said “out of abundance of caution and fairness” it has provided the same information about the test to those registered to take it on Tuesday and Wednesday at sites around the state. The topics that will be covered on the exam will be civil procedure, remedies/constitutional law, criminal law and procedure, professional responsibility, contracts and evidence.
In a statement issued Sunday, Donna Hershkowitz, the bar's chief of programs, said the disclosure was part of a “routine invitation to observe a grading session—the invitation typically goes out after the completion of the exam.” The bar has no evidence the information was shared with students, she said.
The bar did not respond to questions about which deans received the invitation or why the essay topics were included in the email to law school leaders.
The apparently errant disclosure is the latest blow for California's bar exam, which has been criticized by law school deans and others for its low pass rate and second-highest-in-the-nation passing score requirement.
Derek Mueller, a Pepperdine University School of Law professor who covers bar admissions and the test at his blog Excess of Democracy, questioned whether the release will help anyone's chances of passing the exam. Bar examiners scale, or link, the scores to the multiple choice portion of the test to the essay, he wrote in a post on Sunday. The bar's mistake “should have little, if any, impact” on any single test-taker's likelihood of passing the exam, he said.
“What it means very roughly is this: There is an opportunity to account for the difficulty or ease of the test itself and for the higher or lower quality of test-takers by looking at how those test-takers have done compared to other test-takers on previous administrations of the exam,” Mueller said.
Still, the reveal of essay topics does give test-takers two advantages, Mueller said. They'll know right away that the first question is about civil procedure and “can start from word go addressing Civil Procedure and only Civil Procedure.”
“The second advantage is that students can stop studying other, irrelevant topics like Wills & Trusts and focus exclusively on these areas,” Mueller wrote. “Again, it should have the same effect: Everyone studies the same set of topics, everyone knows them a bit better, everyone scores a bit better.”
The bar's announcement led some scheduled test-takers to question whether the email was a hoax or the result of a hack to the agency's account. The bar issued a second statement via Twitter late Saturday night confirming that the announcement was accurate. “This account has not been hacked,” the tweet said.
The bar's letter to law deans is posted below:
Read more:
How Law Schools Fared on California's February 2019 Bar Exam
Nearly 7 in 10 Flunked California's February 2019 Bar Exam
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJimmy Carter’s 1974 Law Day Speech: A Call for Lawyers to Do the Public Good
14 minute readDelivery of Legal Services Is Changing as More States Explore Reform Measures
Coalition of AGs Support Updates to ABA's Legal Education Diversity Standard
3 minute readSotomayor, Speaking With Civics Students, Eyes AI's Impact on Law
Trending Stories
- 1How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 2Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 3Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 4Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250