Ex-CFPB Lawyer 'May Have Abused' Authority, Inspector General Says
According to the report, Blankenstein asked a subordinate at the CFPB for an email of support after his previous blog posts were revealed.
July 29, 2019 at 03:15 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Eric Blankenstein may have abused his former position at the CFPB when he encouraged a subordinate to write a public and supportive email after Blankenstein's racist blog posts were unveiled, the agency's Inspector General said, in a report released by Senate Democrats.
The Inspector General said that Blankenstein, who has since gone onto to work at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, may have abused his position as CFPB policy associate director when he pushed for the supportive email. And the report said that may also have resulted in Blankenstein using his authority for personal gain.
The report was dated May 7 but was not made public until Senate Banking ranking Democrat Sherrod Brown of Ohio and committee member Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released it Monday.
The senators called on HUD Secretary Benjamin Carson to fire Blankenstein and asked CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger to reestablish the agency's Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity, which was disbanded when Blankenstein was at the agency.
The Washington Post reported in October that Blankenstein had written racist blogs and had said that the majority of hate crimes are hoaxes.
Democratic senators, the labor union representing some CFPB employees and consumer groups immediately called for Blankenstein's firing, saying he should not oversee fair lending issues if he took such positions.
Blankenstein asked a subordinate at the CFPB for an email of support and then-Acting CFPB Director Mick Mulvaney refused to fire him. In fact, Mulvaney gave Blankenstein a show of support after the story was published and told him he had been smeared by the Washington Post, the Inspector General said.
Blankenstein later went to work in the general counsel's office at HUD.
The two senators sent a letter to the CFPB's Inspector General on Monday asking for an investigation into Mulvaney's dismantling of the separate fair lending office and his decision to move it into his office, with Blankenstein in charge.
And they asked for a probe into why Kraninger kept Blankenstein at the agency even after Mulvaney left.
In a separate letter, they asked Carson to fire Blankenstein.
“Continuing to employ Mr. Blankenstein at a high-level position at HUD despite the troubling findings and conclusions of the IG's report would send a disturbing message to your staff and the American people that HUD values protecting political allies over fulfilling the agency's mission of eliminating housing discrimination, that it will shield political allies,” the senators wrote.
Finally, the senators asked Kraninger to fire the political appointees that Mulvaney had hired.
“Mr. Blankenstein's troubling tenure at the CFPB demonstrates the damage that turning over important functions at independent regulators to political appointees can cause to consumers and CFPB employees and we strongly urge you to dismiss CFPB's political appointees and return the agency to the design intended by Congress,” the senators wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
2 minute readAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250