Capital One Hit With Civil Suits in DC, Va. Federal Courts Over Alleged Data Breach
Capital One is facing class action lawsuits over a major data breach said to have exposed sensitive information of more than 100 million customers and card applicants.
July 30, 2019 at 01:47 PM
4 minute read
Capital One is facing class action lawsuits over a major data breach said to have exposed sensitive information of more than 100 million customers and card applicants.
By Tuesday afternoon at least two lawsuits had been filed against the company in federal courts along the East Coast. The suits both contend that the bank failed to properly secure and monitor the data of its customers, and seek to bring claims on behalf of the estimated 106 million people affected.
Kevin Zosiak, a Connecticut resident, filed a lawsuit against the banking company Tuesday morning in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Manhattan attorney Linda Nussbaum of the Nussbaum Law Group filed the lawsuit, along with Greenwich, Connecticut, attorney Adam Frankel of Greenwich Legal Associates.
READ ZOSIAK'S COMPLAINT:
The 15-page complaint contends that Capital One, which is estimated to have more than $373 billion in assets, should have been aware of data vulnerabilities, since it has, allegedly, been the subject of security breaches previously. Capital One is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, and incorporated in Delaware.
“Defendants' data security obligations and promises were particularly important given the substantial increase in data breaches, which were widely known to the public and to anyone in defendants' industries,” Zosiak said in the complaint.
DuWayne Baird, an Ohio resident, filed his class action over the breach in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Attorneys from Tampa, Florida's Morgan & Morgan and Baltimore's Murphy, Falcon & Murphy filed the suit on behalf of Baird.
Baird's 49-page complaint alleges that not only was the company negligent in protecting the data, it also failed to comply with federal requirements about maintaining and disposing of data. Along with alleging negligence and breach of implied contract, Baird raises claims of unjust enrichment, invasion of privacy and several claims under Ohio's consumer protection statutes.
In an emailed statement, John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan said, “Like so many others, Capital One knew the risks of a security breach and, we allege, did not take the proper steps to protect the personal information applicants and customers trusted the company to safeguard. You'd think with one data breach after another, companies would wise up and take responsibility for the data it collects from consumers, but unfortunately, they continue to shirk that responsibility.”
READ BAIRD'S COMPLAINT:
New York Attorney General Letitia James also announced Tuesday morning her office was launching an investigation into the possible data breach.
The press office of Capital One did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
The proposed class action comes a day after the company announced the breach and the feds charged a Seattle woman for allegedly perpetrating the breach.
The bank announced the breach Monday, saying it likely affected an estimated 100 million American customers and 6 million Canadian customers, and that the largest cache of data came from consumers and small businesses that applied for card products from 2005 through early 2019. The information that was exposed included names, address, phone numbers, emails, dates of birth, as well as fragments of transaction data and Social Security and bank account numbers for some customers.
According to the company, no credit card account numbers or log-in credentials were compromised.
Both complaints said the breach occurred in late March and continued through late April, but the company only learned about the breach July 19. The complaints further contended that the financial services company only learned about the breach after an unnamed person sent the company a link to a file containing the leaked information.
Also on Monday, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Washington announced it had arrested a 33-year-old software engineer named Paige Thompson in connection with the breach. According to the feds, Thompson breached the bank's security through a reconfigured firewall on an app, and later posted the information on the software development site GitHub. The feds said a GitHub user later saw Thompson's post, and then alerted Capital One about the breach.
The company's statement announcing the breach said that, based on the company's analysis, it was unlikely the information had been disseminated, or used for fraud, but that it would continue to investigate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements
CFPB Alleges Berkshire Hathaway Subsidiary Originated Unaffordable Housing Loans
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.