Ex-Kavanaugh Clerk Deemed 'Not Qualified' for Bench Defends His Nomination
Former Kavanaugh clerk Justin Walker faced questions at his confirmation hearing for a Kentucky trial court seat over his lack of court experience.
July 31, 2019 at 12:55 PM
5 minute read
Justin Walker, who vigorously advocated for the U.S. Supreme Court confirmation of his former boss, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, drew pointed questions Wednesday during a Senate hearing on his own federal court nomination after the American Bar Association deemed him “not qualified” for the bench.
Walker, 37, a litigator at Dinsmore & Shohl who also teaches at Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville, was tapped by President Donald Trump for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. A former clerk to Kavanaugh on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Walker also clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy.
“The ABA rated you unqualified because of your experience level. I respect the ABA a lot, but to me it's a question all of us will have to answer. Why are you qualified to be a judge?” Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsay Graham, R-South Carolina, said at Walker's confirmation hearing.
Walker said his career demonstrated his qualifications in various ways, including: teaching students trial practice, criminal law and evidence. He also pointed to his academic writings—”hundreds of pages”—about criminal procedure and other topics; maintenance of a law practice while being a full-time law professor, and 17 letters from “hundreds of local lawyers” and former students attesting to his open-mindedness.
Over the past two years, Democrats have zeroed in at times on the relative lack of court experience, and age, of some of Trump's judicial candidates. One nominee—who later withdrew—got tripped up trying to answer a question about the definition of a “motion in limine.” A 36-year-old former Williams & Connolly partner, confirmed to the Fourth Circuit, was pressed about her “life experience.”
California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat, on Wednesday homed in on Walker's lack of actual trial and court practice.
“You never served as sole or leading counsel at a trial,” she told Walker. “You appear to have worked on only one criminal case—a recent pro bono matter. Have you worked on any other criminal case?”
Walker said he has worked on “some other criminal matters,” but, he added, “the thrust of my career has been in academia.” Walker reported earning about $95,300 from his Louisville teaching post last year, in addition to receiving an $8,500 honorarium from the Federalist Society.
Feinstein pressed again asking him how many bench trials he had handled. “Have you ever taken a deposition in a federal case?” she asked. Walker said he took one deposition in a state case, adding, “My role has been at times in the courtroom, but more often than not, exploring the law, writing about the law.”
Walker noted that Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan went to the federal bench without actual trial experience. “I can analyze the kind of complex legal questions judges do,” Walker told the committee. “I would encourage you not to just take my word for it but the word of 200 litigators from my local community that I have the temperament, background and experience.”
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee defended Walker's nomination, calling him a “lawyer's lawyer.” Lee said federal district court judges come from different backgrounds, some with trial experience.
“Others come with a lot of writing experience,” Lee said, calling that skill “every bit as important.” In walker, Lee added, “We have someone who will come to the federal district court well prepared to deal with in many ways the most difficult part of the job—dealing with dispositive motions.”
Walker, part of a wave of former Kavanaugh clerks who backed the then-judge's nomination to the Supreme Court last year, made dozens of local and national media appearances on Kavanaugh's behalf.
In an interview with The National Law Journal before Kavanaugh's nomination, Walker tried to dispel any notion that Kavanaugh would disappoint conservatives. “I would bet the farm that Judge Kavanaugh would not go wobbly” on key conservative issues,” Walker said. “He doesn't have a wobbly bone in his body.”
The committee hearing adjourned with the record left open for senators to submit written questions to Walker and other nominees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readSupreme Court Will Try to Settle 'Endless Game of Ping-Pong' Over Louisiana Congressional Map
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 3Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 4In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 5Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250