Judge Blames Roger Stone for Roger Stone's Problems, Refuses to Dismiss Charges
The judge denied Stone's motion to dismiss charges against him, but said he can use parts of the report to aid his defense, provided he does not share them publicly.
August 01, 2019 at 11:47 AM
3 minute read
Trump ally Roger Stone and his legal team will gain access to certain redacted portions of special counsel Robert Meuller III’s report, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington ruled Thursday.
The judge denied Stone’s motion to dismiss charges against him, but said he can use parts of the report to aid his defense, provided he does not share them publicly.
The order allows Stone to view information that the government had withheld to avoid affecting the ongoing prosecution of the case. But Stone still won’t be able to access any information that would infringe on the personal privacy of third parties or cause them reputational harm, or anything that would raise national security or law enforcement concerns.
Stone is accused of lying to congressional investigators looking into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, obstructing justice and tampering with a witness.
Jackson said Stone is in no position to complain, because he “chose to place himself directly in the vortex of multiple investigating bodies when he publicly took credit for the Wikileaks release of hacked Democratic Party emails, even if it were just ‘braggadocio.’
“Based on the allegations in the indictment which are assumed to be true for purposes of these motions, it is fair to say that Roger Stone has no one but himself to blame for the fact that he was investigated by the Department of Justice,” the order said.
Stone’s Fort Lauderdale attorney Bruce Rogow said his team looks forward to receiving the unredacted versions of Mueller’s report, and added, “braggadocio is not a crime.” He noted that one of the legal questions raised in Stone’s motion to dismiss was a first.
“The judge treated the serious constitutional issues we raised and did so seriously and at length. These are important issues, and, for example, the appropriations clause question as applied to the special counsel is one never addressed before,” Rogow said. “If Mr. Stone is acquitted, there will be no need to present that to the appellate court or the Supreme Court.”
Jackson disagreed with Stone’s contention that his indictment violated the U.S. Constitution’s appropriations clause, which gives Congress exclusive power over the federal purse, because the special counsel’s investigation wasn’t approved by Congress.
Stone also argued that he was selectively prosecuted because of his support of Trump. But Jackson disagreed, finding he’d provided no proof that he was singled out from anyone in a similar boat. Stone had claimed two people who weren’t prosecuted, Jerome Corsi and Randy Credico, were similarly situated because they allegedly lied to the special counsel. But the judge pointed out that Stone was indicted on a range of charges that Corsi and Credico never faced.
Stone is living under an enhanced gag order that bans him from posting anything on social media, after a series of run-ins with Jackson over his posts.
Read the court order:
Related stories:
Defense Promises Gagged Roger Stone’s ‘Lonely Voice Presents No Threat’
Roger Stone Is Bench Slapped, Gagged Over Hostile Instagram Post
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250