Michael Dreeben's Job Hunting, as SCOTUS Advocates Bid Farewell
Michael Dreeben, a former longtime deputy U.S. solicitor general, displayed a lighter side at a party in Washington on Thursday attended by leading Supreme Court advocates.
August 02, 2019 at 10:53 AM
5 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan and dozens of lawyers who argue at the U.S. Supreme Court turned out Thursday to celebrate the career of newly retired deputy U.S. Solicitor General Michael Dreeben, who argued more than 100 cases before the court and aided special counsel Robert Mueller III in his Trump investigation.
Known as a straightforward, no-nonsense expert on federal criminal law, Dreeben displayed his lighter side at the party, which took place at a downtown Washington bar called Dirty Habit, a name that is difficult to imagine being associated with Dreeben.
When asked what his next chapter will be, the 65-year-old Dreeben smiled and said, “I’m looking for a job. Do you have one?” He did not elaborate, but friends said he is casting a wide net with law firms and other possible options.
Lawyers who worked with Dreeben during his 30-year tenure confirmed that he can be mischievous. In an essay on SCOTUSblog Nicole Saharsky, now at Mayer Brown, recounted the time in 2013 when Dreeben argued Bond v. United States, in which a chemical weapons treaty was invoked in the case of a woman who tried to poison her husband’s mistress.
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. posited a hypothetical of the woman retaliating against her former friend by pouring a bottle of vinegar in the friend’s goldfish bowl. “As I read the statute, that would be a violation of the statute, potentially punishable by life imprisonment, wouldn’t it?”
After the argument, Saharsky wrote, Dreeben placed a bottle of vinegar in the SG’s office refrigerator. A label stated, “Caution! Not for use on goldfish. Prohibited Chemical Weapon under Federal Law, 18 U.S.C. 229.”
Kagan, who worked with Dreeben briefly when she served as solicitor general in 2009 and 2010, gave Dreeben a hug at Thursday’s party but declined to comment on his departure from the Justice Department. At a 2016 event marking Dreeben’s 100th argument, Kagan said he helped her learn quickly about appellate practice and criminal law. Kagan said she felt she was “in the company of a magnificent attorney doing a magnificent job.”
U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco and former SGs Gregory Garre and Paul Clement also joined the celebration, as did current deputies and associates in the office, including Malcolm Stewart, Elizabeth Prelogar, Anthony Yang and Rachel Kovner, likely soon-to-be confirmed as a federal district court judge in New York. Prelogar served with Dreeben on Mueller’s special counsel team.
“As I’ve often said when speaking to conferences of federal prosecutors at the Justice Department, Michael Dreeben knows more about criminal law than anyone else on Earth,” Francisco said in a tribute at SCOTUSblog. “But it’s not only his knowledge that sets him apart. It’s also his talent as an advocate, and his tireless devotion to his craft.”
Among the Supreme Court advocates who attended, most with former ties to the SG’s office, were Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin, John Elwood of Arnold & Porter, Sarah Harrington of Goldstein & Russell, Andrew Pincus of Mayer Brown, Beth Brinkmann of Covington & Burling, Erin Murphy of Kirkland & Ellis, Christopher Wright of Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, David Frederick of Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, Pratik Shah of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, William Jay of Goodwin Procter, Elaine Goldenberg of Munger, Tolles & Olson, Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of Ropes & Gray, and Irv Gornstein of the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. Jeffrey Minear, counselor to the chief justice, also attended.
Judge Sri Srinivasan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit was on hand, and so were Judges Beryl Howell, Randy Moss, James Boasberg and Paul Friedman of Washington’s federal trial court.
Dreeben next week is set to speak at an American Bar Association event in San Francisco focused on the Supreme Court’s criminal law decisions. He’s appearing on a panel with U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. and Mary McNamara of San Francisco’s Swanson & McNamara.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 2Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 3Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 4Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 5Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250