DC Whistleblower Bar Awaits Movement on MSPB
Despite symbolic moves from Congress, whistleblower lawyer Stephen Kohn says threats to government and corporate tipsters abound.
August 07, 2019 at 02:37 PM
4 minute read
Last week Congress commemorated National Whistleblower Appreciation Day—the first time both the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate passed resolutions recognizing a day to honor whistleblowers. The lawmakers picked July 30 because it marked the 241st anniversary of the nation’s first whistleblower legislation, which became law before the Bill of Rights.
Lawmakers have also looked to take some more concrete, less symbolic steps related to corporate and government whistleblowers—with a major exception: Congress has taken no action to place anyone on the Merit Systems Protection Board, which is the “quasi-judicial agency in the executive branch” responsible for reviewing most federal employees’ whistleblower appeals.
The three-member appeals board has gone without a quorum for two years of President Donald Trump’s administration and has been entirely vacant since March 2019, when its last Senate-confirmed member’s term expired.
Trump nominated three members to fill the board, and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee advanced all three nominees to the full Senate between February 2019 and June 2019. But no vote has been held. Never before in MSPB’s 40-year history has the board lacked a Senate-confirmed member, according to Government Executive.
Stephen Kohn, partner at Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, a D.C. law firm specializing in whistleblower protection, said the MSPB vacancies have created a backlog of thousands of cases of federal whistleblowers.
“If it remains vacant, [federal whistleblowers] effectively have no rights,” Kohn said. “I just don’t know how they get out of this.” Kohn said the backlog “is devastating,” and the only way to tunnel out of the cases could be to allow federal employees to proceed de novo in federal court after waiting a certain period—perhaps 180 days—for action from MSPB.
Kohn is also founder and chairman of the board of the National Whistleblower Center, which advocated for the creation of a National Whistleblower Day. Among the center’s current efforts are campaigns to safeguard protections for whistleblowers under the False Claims Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission’s whistleblower program in the wake of the financial crisis.
He said retaliation for whistleblowers in the federal government and in corporate America “remains extremely high.” In the federal government, Kohn identified the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as having the biggest problem protecting whistleblowers from retaliation. In corporate America, Kohn said the problems exist across industries and include companies such as Google and Apple.
There’s no shortage of lawyers wanting to work on whistleblower cases, Kohn said, citing his interactions with students as an adjunct professor at Northeastern University School of Law. For now, he said, there aren’t enough whistleblower lawyer jobs to meet the interest he sees. But some of that could soon change.
The Taxpayer First Act of 2019, which was signed into law by Trump in July, includes new language regarding anti-retaliation protection of whistleblowers involved in tax matters. Kohn pointed to the legislation as something that should spur labor and employment practices around D.C. to integrate whistleblower protection work into their practices.
There’s reason to think other changes to federal law relating to whistleblowers could arrive before 2020 as well. The Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus, a bipartisan group of legislators formed in 2015, added three new members last month: Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee; Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois; and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Arizona. The 14-member caucus is led by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields Hires SEC Associate Director in Latest D.C. Lateral Hiring Spree
4 minute readTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Trending Stories
- 1Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 2Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 3Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 4'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 5New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250