McGahn Now Must Face Judge After Rebuffing Democrats' Subpoena
The now-Jones Day partner in Washington was a key witness in the Mueller investigation.
August 07, 2019 at 04:25 PM
6 minute read
In the ever-escalating skirmish between U.S. House Democrats and the Trump administration, there’s now a new defendant: Donald McGahn, the former White House counsel and key witness in the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.
House Democrats on Wednesday sued McGahn in Washington’s federal trial court to force him to comply with a subpoena seeking testimony about his time leading the White House counsel’s office and interaction with President Trump.
“The Judiciary Committee is now determining whether to recommend articles of impeachment against the president based on the obstructive conduct described by the special counsel. But it cannot fulfill this most solemn constitutional responsibility without hearing testimony from a crucial witness to these events: former White House Counsel Donald F. McGahn II,” House general counsel Douglas Letter said in the complaint. “McGahn, however, has defied a Congressional subpoena to appear before the Judiciary Committee, at the direction of President Trump, who claims McGahn is “absolutely immune” from testifying, a claim with no basis in law.”
Annie Owens and Joshua Geltzer of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown University Law Center appeared on the complaint with a team of lawyers from the House’s general counsel’s office.
The lawsuit, which was assigned to Chief Judge Beryl Howell, will test the scope of the Trump administration’s oft-used assertions of executive privilege to stymie the release of information tied to the Russia probe. McGahn’s lawyer, William Burck of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, said in May that McGahn was refusing to appear to testify at the wishes of the White House.
The White House had instructed McGahn, who’s now back at Jones Day as a partner in Washington, to defy a subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee. The committee is demanding McGahn testify about former special counsel Robert Mueller III’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential elections. McGahn was a key witness, one who interacted daily with the president and who reportedly rebuffed his efforts to interfere in the investigation.
The lawsuit confronts Trump’s efforts to stop McGahn from appearing before the House, and includes public statements from the president saying, “We’re fighting all the subpoenas,” and “I don’t want people testifying.”
“Consistent with that approach, the president has sought to prevent McGahn—now a private citizen—from testifying before the Judiciary Committee,” the lawsuit said. “The day before McGahn’s required appearance before the Judiciary Committee pursuant to the subpoena at issue in this litigation, the president purported to direct McGahn not to appear, claiming that McGahn is ‘absolutely immune’ from compelled testimony. The next day, without offering any accommodation, McGahn failed to appear based on the president’s directive.”
The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel argued in a 15-page legal opinion, published this year, that the president could stop McGahn from testifying. The opinion pointed to a 1999 opinion that said a congressional subpoena requiring a senior presidential adviser to testify would be “akin to” requiring the president himself to appear.
Mueller testified for more than five hours on Wednesday about his 448-page report showing Russia’s efforts to meddle in the 2016 election and incidents in which Trump allegedly tried to derail the special counsel’s investigation. Trump has denied any move to obstruct the investigation.
McGahn cooperated extensively with Mueller’s team, speaking for more than 30 hours about his interactions with Trump. The report showed among other things that Trump pushed McGahn to find a way to fire Mueller based on the president’s contention that the special counsel had conflicts of interests. Mueller told House lawmakers on Wednesday he had no such conflict.
McGahn said he refused to engage with then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein over firing Mueller, saying that any move might make it seem the president was trying to “meddle in the investigation.”
The lawsuit against McGahn comes as House Democrats are waging a series of court fights that seek financial records and other information Trump has long sought to shield from the public. Trump told voters in 2016 he would release his tax returns, as presidents in modern times have done, but the president has since refused any disclosure.
The House last month sued the Treasury Department and the IRS for copies of Trump’s tax returns, and Trump has sued the House Ways and Means Committee from requesting or obtaining copies of his state tax returns from New York agencies. This week, Trump filed suit in California court to stop a new state law that requires presidential candidates to release their tax returns in order to appear on the ballot.
Meanwhile, two federal judges have upheld congressional committee subpoenas that command Trump’s accounting firm and his longtime lender, Deutsche Bank, to turn over financial records. A federal appeals panel recently appeared inclined to rule against Trump in the case involving his accountant Mazars USA, and the Deutsche Bank case will be heard next month in New York.
Several other lawsuits contend that Trump’s continued profiting from his business ventures while in office is violating the constitutional check against presidents receiving foreign and domestic “emoluments.” One appeals court ruled in his favor, dismissing a suit, while another case, brought by congressional Democrats, is pending in Washington’s federal trial court.
The House suit against McGahn is posted below:
Read more:
‘Multiple Felony Charges’: Ex-Federal Prosecutors Call Out Trump’s Conduct
Trump’s Lawyer Faced Skeptical DC Circuit Panel in Subpoena Fight
Who Is Trevor McFadden? Meet the Judge Assigned the Trump Tax Returns Case
Justice Dept. Says White House Can Block Don McGahn’s Congressional Testimony
Don McGahn, Defying House Subpoena, Follows Trump’s Orders
Donald McGahn Once Said He Represented ‘Pictures on the Wall,’ Not Trump
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Trending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 2Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 3Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
- 4'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
- 5'Astronomical' Interest Rates: $1B Settlement to Resolve Allegations of 'Predatory' Lending Cancels $534M in Small-Business Debts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250