Michael Dreeben, Longtime SCOTUS Advocate, Joins Georgetown Law Faculty
"The energy of the law school is palpable. I look forward to participating in academic life at Georgetown," Dreeben said in a statement Monday.
August 12, 2019 at 12:02 PM
4 minute read
Michael Dreeben, a former longtime U.S. deputy solicitor general who is widely considered a leading authority on criminal law, will join Georgetown University Law Center in Washington as a distinguished lecturer in government for the 2019-20 academic year.
“In his 30 years of extraordinary public service at the U.S. Department of Justice, Michael Dreeben played a powerful role in helping shape the law as one of the preeminent Supreme Court advocates and as a leading expert in federal criminal law,” said Georgetown Law Dean William M. Treanor. “We are honored to have him join our faculty for the upcoming school year.”
Dreeben, a Duke Law School alumnus, joined the Justice Department’s office of the solicitor general in 1988. He has argued more than 100 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, establishing a reputation for his crisp and cogent arguments in criminal law cases. In June 2017, he took a leave of absence to join Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Dreeben represented the special counsel’s office in federal court against legal challenges to its authority before announcing his retirement in June. During his tenure in the solicitor general’s office, Dreeben argued cases involving hate crimes and the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment rights in the internet age, and cases involving public corruption and private fraud.
Dreeben spoke last week in San Francisco on an American Bar Association panel assessing recent Supreme Court criminal-law decisions. The court’s 7-2 decision in Gamble v. United States, he said, which upheld the power of states and federal prosecutors to criminally charge the same conduct, displayed competing visions among the justices about what the U.S. Constitution does.
“It probably is a proxy war for the big battle to come in Roe v. Wade,” Dreeben said, noting the vote put Justices Neil Gorsuch and Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the same side in dissent. “That raises one of the most important questions of our time: Why is a judge authorized to follow a precedent that he or she thinks is an incorrect interpretation of the Constitution?” he said. “They have an oath to uphold the Constitution, not what five justices say.”
Dreeben’s year-long academic appointment is part of Georgetown Law’s Distinguished Visitors from Government Program, which brings former officials who have recently left public service to campus. He will guest lecture and serve as a resource for students, in addition to participating in faculty workshops.
“Georgetown Law is renowned for its exploration of complex legal questions at the deepest level,” Dreeben said in a statement. “The energy of the law school is palpable. I look forward to participating in academic life at Georgetown and being part of its vibrant and collaborative culture.”
Dreeben’s recent retirement from the Justice Department drew praise from judges, professors and litigators, writing at SCOTUSblog about his commitment to public service and how he shaped those in his orbit.
“As I’ve often said when speaking to conferences of federal prosecutors at the Justice Department, Michael Dreeben knows more about criminal law than anyone else on Earth,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco said in a tribute. “But it’s not only his knowledge that sets him apart. It’s also his talent as an advocate, and his tireless devotion to his craft.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
- 1GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 2Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 3'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 4Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 5A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250