Legal Services Corporation Awards $4.3 Million in Pro Bono Innovation Grants
The grants, including more than $500,000 to legal aid organizations in the Washington area, will support new ways to assist low-income clients.
August 15, 2019 at 02:45 PM
2 minute read
The Legal Services Corp. said Thursday it is handing out more than $4.3 million in “pro bono innovation grants” for projects supporting low-income clients, including more than $500,000 to Washington, D.C., and Virginia.
Congress created the LSC in 1974 through the Legal Services Corporation Act, whose board members are appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. LSC president Jim Sandman thanked Congress in a statement Thursday for establishing and increasing support for its pro bono innovation fund.
“These grants stimulate more participation by pro bono volunteers,” Sandman said. “They enhance public-private partnerships, leverage the federal investment in civil legal aid, and allow our grantees to reach more people in need of civil legal assistance.”
A total of 14 legal aid organizations will receive the grants across 13 states and D.C. In the metropolitan Washington area, Legal Services of Northern Virginia will receive $232,400 and will deploy the grant for its veterans law pro bono project. LSC said Legal Services of Northern Virginia will use the money for “legal checkups by law students, review of records by pro bono volunteers, civil legal aid assistance, and individual pro bono case placements.”
Legal Services of Northern Virginia previously received an LSC grant of $290,283 in 2017, according to LSC.
In D.C., LSC awarded $285,596 to the Neighborhood Legal Services Program of the District of Columbia. LSC said the grant will be used for the group’s “housing cooperative preservation initiative” that services low equity cooperatives. LSC said there are more than 100 low equity cooperatives in D.C. that provide more than 3,000 units of affordable housing to area residents.
In other states, the grants will go toward the recruitment of pro bono attorneys, training of pro bono attorneys, and other ventures aimed at meeting the needs of legal aid clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn, Greenberg, ArentFox Schiff Among Latest to Lure Lateral Partners in DC
3 minute readTopping Big Law, Litigation Firm the Latest to Dole Out Above-Market Bonuses
3 minute readCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Eric Adams Expects Imminent Indictment, Her Lawyer Says
- 2Delaware Senate Approves Bonnie David for Vice Chancellor
- 3New York Court of Appeals Tightens Pleading Standards Against Insurance Policyholder
- 4Polsinelli Associate Launches Transaction Management Platform Project Fortress
- 5Attorney General Seeks Permanent Injunction Against Abortion-Related Telemedicine
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250