Mueller Cooperator Rick Gates, Awaiting Sentencing, Testifies Against Greg Craig
In his testimony in Washington court, Rick Gates said Craig, then a Skadden partner, had been involved in the public relations strategy of the report at the center of the criminal charges.
August 22, 2019 at 07:38 PM
5 minute read
In February 2018, Richard Gates appeared in a Washington federal courtroom to plead guilty to charges brought by Robert Mueller's team, beginning his new life as a key cooperator in the special counsel's Russia investigation.
Gates returned to the same courtroom Thursday to mark a new high point in his cooperation with prosecutors: testifying against Greg Craig, the prominent Washington attorney accused of misleading the Justice Department about his past work for Ukraine. Seated in the witness stand, next to U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia, Gates was reminded of the plea agreement that landed him in court last year.
Gates testified about the work he and Paul Manafort did for Ukraine in 2012, when Craig led a team at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom that prepared a report on the prosecution of the country's former prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko. Craig was charged in April with misleading the Justice Department about his role in the public release of the report. Prosecutors contend he wanted to avoid registering as a foreign agent.
In his testimony, Gates said Craig had been involved in the public relations strategy for the report, even suggesting The New York Times reporter who received an advance copy as part of the media rollout. When prosecutor Fernando Campoamor-Sanchez asked whether Craig delivered the document to the reporter on behalf of Ukraine, Gates responded, "Yes."
Craig's trial is set to resume Friday in Washington's federal trial court, where other current or former Skadden attorneys could testify.
Craig has said he was entirely truthful with the Justice Department about his work for Ukraine. Although he has not been charged with failing to register as an agent of Ukraine, he has disputed there was any requirement to report his work under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law that requires law firms and lobby shops to reveal certain U.S.-based campaigns for foreign government clients. Craig has argued he spoke with reporters to protect his reputation and to counter efforts to spin the the Tymoshenko report.
Craig's defense team tried to undercut Gates' credibility. Zuckerman Spaeder partner Paula Junghans asked Gates about allegations that he filed false tax returns, failed to disclose foreign bank accounts and failed to register as a foreign agent in connection with his past work for Ukraine. Gates pleaded guilty to a single conspiracy charge in connection with those offenses.
"So you pled guilty to conspiring to violate all of those federal statutes?" Junghans asked.
"I did," Gates replied.
Junghans noted that Gates had also pleaded guilty to lying to Mueller's team. "That's correct," Gates answered.
In the same month Gates pleaded guilty, Alexander van der Zwaan, a former London-based associate at Skadden, admitted to lying to Mueller's team about his involvement in the Tymoshenko report. Van der Zwaan was later sentenced to 30 days in prison, and he has been disbarred.
Junghans used her questioning to underscore Gates' close personal relationship with van der Zwaan and to suggest the former Skadden associate went behind Craig's back to help Ukraine's public relations efforts.
Gates said he convinced van der Zwaan to allow a public relations consultant hired by Ukraine to review a copy of the Tymoshenko report. The public relations consultant, Jonathan Hawker, had testified earlier in the week that he was left alone in van der Zwaan's hotel room in Kiev to review the findings.
Junghans said van der Zwaan provided the sneak peek "in spite of the fact that Greg Craig had refused to disclose the report" to Gates and Hawker.
Junghans also used questions to show Gates and van der Zwaan spent time together outside their work on the Tymoshenko report.
"You hung out?" Junghans asked.
"Yes."
"You went to dinners and nightclubs together?" the defense lawyer said.
"We went to dinners," Gates responded.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBinance's Singapore-Based General Counsel Is Shattering Crypto's 'Bro Ceiling'
4 minute readDC Circuit OKs Enforcement of Intra-EU Awards, Does Not Decide If Other Treaties' Awards May Be Enforced
7 minute readMike Lynch's Brush With Prison Taught Him Life Is Precious. Then a Yacht Accident Proved Him Right
Elon Musk's X 'Deceives Users' and Lacks Transparency, EU Alleges in First DSA Enforcement Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
- 2Latham Lures Restructuring Partners From Weil, Paul Weiss
- 3Haynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
- 4Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 5'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250