Citi: DC Law Firm Revenue Trails US, But Bright Spots Remain
Even with higher expenses eating away at firms' bottom lines, many have reason to hope for a relatively strong year.
September 06, 2019 at 02:53 PM
3 minute read
Washington, D.C., law firms' revenue growth lagged behind the national average in the first half of 2019, according to Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, but there are still reasons to be upbeat about the rest of the year.
Jeff Grossman of Citi Private Bank said the 15 D.C. firms included in the bank's recent survey showed revenue growth of 3% in the first half of 2019, as compared to 5.9% industrywide.
"It, to me, is very much in line with where the D.C. marketplace has been with moderate growth," Grossman said. "I would describe it as more moderate growth, [rather than] soft or modest growth."
Unlike other regions that benefited from mergers and acquisitions activity, D.C.—which relies more upon regulatory, regulatory enforcement and antitrust work—has seen an anticipated tapering. However, Grossman emphasized, there was reason to remain optimistic that the D.C. region could compete with firms in better performing locales. Washington-based firms in Citi's survey posted a 0.5% uptick in demand, whereas several other regions had negative changes in demand.
The slight uptick in demand plus rising rates—D.C. rates are up 4.3% as compared to a national average of 4.6%—gave Grossman reason to forecast a "positive outlook" in D.C. for the remainder of 2019.
To be clear, Citi Private Bank's results do not paint an overly rosy picture for Am Law 100 firms in D.C. or other regions. Unlike previous years where the range in revenue growth was tighter across the country, Grossman said, there's a greater disparity between the best performing regions and the worst.
Also, some of last year's trends are finally coming home to roost on Big Law's doorstep: In particular, expenses are rising. In D.C., expenses were up 6.5% through 2019's first half—as compared with a national average of 5.9%—but Grossman noted that some other regions saw even higher expense increases, reaching as high as 9%.
When all is said and done, Grossman emphasized that a healthy economy in 2018 and more M&A activity last year may skew some of the statistics, as 2018 was a good year for Big Law nationwide.
"It's going to be a good year," Grossman said. "It's just not going to be 2018, but relative to any year post-recession excluding 2018 which was the best year on-record, it's going to be a good year compared to any other year."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
2 minute readSignaling Growth Goals, Some Law Firms Promote Record Partner Classes
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readDC's Birchstone Moore Combines With Chicago-Founded Wealth Planning Firm
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 16-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 2'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
- 3Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
- 4The Power of Student Prior Knowledge in Legal Education
- 5Chicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250