Playing the Long Game: Client Development Strategies for Young Lawyers
Making the effort to build lasting relationships and garner a good reputation early is key to long-term success.
September 10, 2019 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
From the Editor: Today, we launch our new National Law Journal series, "On the Rise: Voices from Young Lawyers." We will feature pieces from our 2019 D.C. Rising Stars and other prominent young attorneys in Washington and beyond. In their columns, the writers will tackle key topics on business development, transitioning from public to private practice (and back), successful law firm diversity practices and more. We start our series with MoloLamken's Eric Nitz, who writes about how young lawyers can build successful strategies for client development. —Lisa Helem, editor-in-chief, The National Law Journal
Client development can seem to be one of the most mystifying aspects of legal practice. That's particularly true for younger lawyers. Law schools (usually) do not teach client-development strategies, and most firms do not prioritize client-development training, formal or otherwise, for their associates or new partners. But business development boils down to a basic principle: clients only hire lawyers that they know and trust. Earning their confidence does not happen overnight. It takes time. For young lawyers, that is good news. With long careers ahead of them, time is the one critical advantage and valuable asset that even the most senior rainmakers lack.
With the right strategies, a young lawyer can excel at business development and can build his or her own client base. The earlier in a career that a lawyer begins thinking about client development, the more opportunities that lawyer will have for building trust and confidence with potential clients.
Develop a Sterling, Outward-Facing Reputation
At some level, every lawyer understands the importance of a professional reputation. But often, younger lawyers are more concerned about their reputations within the firm than without. After all, one's reputation within the firm can influence promotion decisions and, at some firms, compensation. But a lawyer's reputation outside the firm is what causes a potential client to seek out that lawyer's expertise or assistance.
Of course, that does not mean young lawyers should not be concerned with their reputations inside the firm. Often, a reputation as a top associate who can get things done will beget the outward-facing opportunities that help an associate develop his or her own reputation and identity as a lawyer.
Demonstrate Expertise and Competence
The opportunities to interact with others outside the firm are a great opportunity to develop a reputation for expertise and competence. It goes without saying that, when those opportunities arise, lawyers should bring their "A game."
But even when such opportunities are not forthcoming, young lawyers can take the initiative and demonstrate their expertise in other ways. For example, young lawyers might seek out opportunities to write for legal publications, analyzing developments in the law. They might develop and present a continuing legal education course at a conference. They might organize and moderate a panel discussion. Each of these activities offers a platform to demonstrate expertise and knowledge in front of potential in-house counsel or clients.
Cast a Wide Net When Thinking About Potential Clients
Many younger lawyers mistakenly think too narrowly when they contemplate who qualifies as a potential client. For example, some lawyers do not view other litigators at law firms as sources of business. That is a mistake. Lawyers within and outside of your firm, who might make referrals of potential clients, can be great sources of business. This idea takes us back to the key principle described above: Lawyers only make referrals to lawyers whom they know and trust.
Likewise, a younger lawyer may not see much value (from a client-development perspective) in attending a law school reunion, because he or she may have graduated only a few years ago and no classmates are yet in a position to refer work or make attorney-hiring decisions for corporate clients. Of course, today's recent law school graduates are tomorrow's heads of litigation at Fortune 500 companies.
By staying connected with friends and colleagues from law school as careers progress in parallel, young lawyers will have a long runway to develop trust and confidence. That trust will make the young lawyer a natural choice when former classmates transition to in-house roles or begin developing a client-base of their own from which to make referrals.
At its core, client development is, more than anything else, a way of thinking about professional relationships and professional activities. Putting in the effort to begin building long-term relationships of confidence and trust will put a young lawyer's greatest client-development asset—time—to work and will yield great dividends when it comes time to contribute to the firm's client-base.
Eric Nitz is a partner at MoloLamken. He represents individuals and companies in white collar criminal investigations, congressional investigations, and regulatory matters. He has also argued appeals in the D.C. and Federal Circuits, and has briefed appeals in the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous courts of appeals.
|Have you joined our group ALM Young Professionals Network on LinkedIn? We're having powerful conversations that tackle the challenges we all face early in our careers. Request to join here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPreparing for Measured, Responsible and Reasoned Consumer Welfare Policy
4 minute readThe Marble Palace Blog: The Supreme Court’s Bond With Baseball
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250