The Juggling Act: Tips for Young Lawyers with Families
We haven't figured it all out, but here's what we know.
September 12, 2019 at 01:24 PM
8 minute read
From the Editor: Today, we present the second column in our new National Law Journal series, "On the Rise: Voices from Young Lawyers." Josh Lindsay, one of our 2019 D.C. Rising Stars, and his wife Cristina, are Washington, D.C., attorneys raising two lively boys under the age of 5. They offer some solid tips for navigating work-life balance, which include setting boundaries at work. It's the latest installment in our series featuring leading young attorneys discussing their law firm work and lives in the district and beyond. —Lisa Helem, editor-in-chief, The National Law Journal
Achieving ideal "work-life balance." For attorneys in particular, this goal often feels increasingly out of reach. Advancements in technology make it easier to do our jobs from anywhere, while making us easier to reach anywhere—and anytime. The global footprint of modern legal practice places lawyers several time zones away from their clients and often requires international travel.
Alongside these increased demands, lawyers are expected to accomplish more with smaller teams and fewer resources. Meanwhile, home life has grown considerably more hectic, too. Dual-lawyer families are common. Kids have more homework and extracurricular activities. And young parents often live farther from relatives who otherwise might help.
How are lawyers with families expected to juggle all of this? My wife Cristina and I ask ourselves this question often. We are both full-time practicing attorneys with two rambunctious little boys under the age of five and no nearby family. How do we give our boys—and ourselves—the quality of life that led us to pursue professional careers in the first place while continuing to nurture and grow those careers as well?
Spoiler alert: we have not figured that out.
But we have identified some practices that help us keep life in relative balance. These things work for us, and they may not work for everyone, but perhaps our ideas can inspire others to consider ways to better balance their practice and home life too.
|Plan Ahead and Be Flexible
Like walking a balance beam, achieving work-life balance requires constant attention, with frequent adjustments. For us, this means proactively managing both our work life and our home life. We both have the benefit of working with colleagues that place great value in supporting a healthy work-life balance. Still, the demanding nature of legal practice easily would intrude upon our personal life—if we allowed it.
In our law practices, we do our best to manage our time at work in order to protect our time at home. Lawyers are notoriously undertrained in project management, and busy practices leave lawyers little opportunity to manage their hectic schedules. All too often, busy lawyers jump from one deadline to another, leading to late nights and weekend work that consume family time. While this sometimes is unavoidable, every member of a legal team has the opportunity to "manage up"—that is, plan ahead, prepare drafts early, de-conflict schedules, and otherwise make it easier for clients and supervisors to avoid last-minute fire drills—something they will appreciate too.
|Set Your Boundaries—and Stick to Them
Likewise, we establish work-life boundaries and clearly communicate them. We do not shy away from setting expectations concerning our availability, such as times when we may not be reachable for work, limits on the frequency or duration of travel, or flexibility around appointments during the workday. Equally though, our employers know that when we are available, they have our full attention. For example, I take one of our boys to school each morning. Cristina takes our younger son to a different school. My colleagues know that I am mostly unreachable between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. each morning.
I plan around that window, which sometimes means speaking with overseas clients before the sun (and my children) are up. Protecting this hour each morning makes for a much smoother start to our days at home and gives my work colleagues predictability as to my schedule.
|Maximize Your Downtime
When the best-intentioned planning and communication still fails to avoid conflicts between work and life, which it often does, we get creative by using "wasted time" to be productive. For example, taking calls during the commute to work or replying to emails during minutes of downtime.
We do not suggest regularly filling every waking moment with work, but when life truly overwhelms, it is useful to realize that there actually are more hours (or at least minutes) in the day when you need there to be.
|Help Your Partner and They'll Help You
We have also found that achieving an ideal work-life balance requires some management at home too, both to help each other ensure we meet our professional commitments at work and to ensure our family is getting the most from our time together at home.
Above all, we learned early on that we both have to be fully devoted to running our home in order for us to balance careers with family. In a simplistic sense, this means that we both contribute equally to chores around the house. But in reality, this equal division of labor is constantly in flux, and both of us have to accept an unequal share of the load when the other's work demands increase.
To keep home life organized around two busy careers requires planning, which itself requires frequent and honest communication. As commonsense as that may seem, it takes effort to keep each other informed about our work schedules. I have a hard enough time keeping track of my own.
It's not always easy to come home with news that I will be leaving Cristina alone with the kids while I travel overseas. But the earlier we talk about these things at home, the more opportunity we have to sort out any conflicts between our work commitments, plan to pick up the slack at home and set boundaries if necessary around our availability at work.
|Be Present for Family
We make a conscious effort to leave our work at work and avoid talking endlessly about our jobs when we could be focused on our family. This is not easy for two lawyers, who by nature love talking about their practice, but a conscious effort at least helps to sharpen the blurred line between work and home life.
Finally, and most importantly in our view, we have found that a healthy work-life balance greatly depends on the way we use our limited time when we both are away from work. Lawyers sometimes lament that they do not have hobbies because work and family commitments do not leave time for them.
We tackled that challenge by finding a pursuit that we both truly enjoy and that involves our whole family. As crazy as it may sound, for us, this meant starting a small side business. Cristina, the boys and I all enjoy different aspects of the business. It only requires a few hours each week. And it offers an easy way to regularly spend time together, which greatly improves the quality of our lives in the work-life balance.
We may be on the path to achieving a healthy work-life balance, but we are not there yet, and new challenges arise every day. Currently we are discussing how to free up more time in our evenings, which increasingly are consumed with cooking, making school lunches, washing dishes, etc.—and very little quality time with our children. Would better planning help? Perhaps a prepared meal subscription?
We have not figured out the solution yet, but importantly, we are thinking and talking about it. And we continue to make those adjustments needed to walk the balance beam between home life and legal practice.
Josh and Cristina Lindsay live in Washington, D.C., with their two boys, ages 4 and 1. Josh is a senior litigation associate with Squire Patton Boggs. Cristina is an attorney for the federal government. When not practicing law, they grow flowers and create floral arrangements through their business, Poppy Jar Flowers.
Have you joined our group ALM Young Professionals Network on LinkedIn? We're having powerful conversations that tackle the challenges we all face early in our careers. Request to join here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250