Capitol Hill Roiled by Kavanaugh Allegations, but Judges Are Silent
The federal rules governing complaints against judges don't apply to U.S. Supreme Court justices, a panel said recently in dismissing cases confronting Brett Kavanaugh's conduct.
September 17, 2019 at 04:39 PM
4 minute read
As a new sexual misconduct claim involving U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh reverberated around Capitol Hill, the justice and earlier complaints against him that were aired during his confirmation hearing last year were not discussed Tuesday at the formal meeting of the Judicial Conference of the United States.
Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, who briefed the media following the Judicial Conference's meeting, said there had been no discussion about Kavanaugh and the procedures in place for misconduct claims against federal appeals judges who are later elevated to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh was confirmed to the high court from the D.C. Circuit.
Last month, the Judicial Conference's Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability dismissed what were essentially appeals of rulings that said the federal courts were powerless to address misconduct complaints against Kavanaugh because he was now a Supreme Court justice. A panel said the rules governing the conduct of federal judges "unequivocally preclude review" of the merits of complaints against a judge "who has resigned his or her judicial office and thereafter been confirmed as a justice of the Supreme Court."
The misconduct complaints against Kavanaugh stemmed from his angry diatribe at his confirmation hearing. He denied claims that, as a Maryland high school student, he pinned a teenage girl to a bed and sexually assaulted her at a house party. Kavanaugh attacked Democrats and the Clintons for having participated in a "revenge" conspiracy in an effort to derail his nomination to the Supreme Court. He later walked back what he described as "emotional" testimony. "I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said," Kavanaugh said.
Tuesday's Judicial Conference meeting came amid renewed attention on Kavanaugh's conduct as a college student. Two New York Times reporters said they uncovered a new claim of sexual misconduct in which Kavanaugh "pushed his penis into the hand of a female student" during a "drunken dorm party." That student, according to the reporters, has no memory of the alleged incident. Kavanaugh, according to a Times excerpt of the book, did not speak with the two reporters because they could not agree to the terms of an interview.
The authors of the new book, "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation," also reported the FBI did not interview witnesses who purportedly could have corroborated another accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who was a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's. Ramirez also alleged Kavanaugh thrust his penis in her face during a party. Kavanaugh has denied the claim. The new reporting, which the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday called "scurrilous," spurred calls for the justice's impeachment from Democratic presidential candidates.
The Judicial Conference's Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability did not forward any of the Kavanaugh ethics cases to the full Judicial Conference, which comprises the chief judges of the 13 federal appellate courts and Court of International Trade, a Judicial Conference spokesman confirmed Tuesday.
The Judicial Conference, which is the federal courts' policymaking arm, announced a new initiative Tuesday addressing workplace conduct in the judiciary. The conference approved a new model employment dispute resolution plan that is designed to simplify and expand options for addressing workplace misconduct.
The plan incorporates many of the recommendations made by the judiciary's workplace conduct working group, which was set up partly in response to sexual misconduct allegations by former Judge Alex Kozinski. The judge retired in 2017 from the Ninth Circuit in the face of those complaints.
"We're not finished" with efforts to address that issue within the judiciary workplace, said Garland, adding that it requires "continued vigilance. We don't plan on letting up on it."
Read more:
'Scurrilous Accusations': Impeachment Unlikely as Lawmakers Fight About Kavanaugh
Judicial Committee Won't Revive Kavanaugh Misconduct Complaints
Brett Kavanaugh Walks Back His Angry Senate Testimony
Nearly 2,000 Female Lawyers Voice Support for Christine Blasey Ford
Appellate Lawyers Who Backed Kavanaugh Say He's Still Their Man
Alex Kozinski Harassment Allegations Were 'Gut Punch,' Kavanaugh Tells Senate
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
Trending Stories
- 1The Lawyers Waging the Legal Fight Against the Trump Administration
- 2McDermott's Onetime London Leader Headed to Pillsbury
- 3A&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers to EY
- 4Pearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
- 5'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250