'I Wouldn't Write Those Words Today': Eugene Scalia Is Pressed About LGBT Rights
"Yes, I certainly have changed in how I view any number of things since I was in college. I think we've all matured—one would hope—since those days," the Gibson Dunn partner, up for U.S. labor secretary, told U.S. senators on Thursday at his confirmation hearing.
September 19, 2019 at 12:48 PM
5 minute read
Updated 1:57 p.m.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Eugene Scalia told senators at his confirmation hearing Thursday for U.S. labor secretary that he believed it is "wrong" for an employer to fire a worker because of sexual orientation or gender identity.
"I think that most of my clients had policies against that. Certainly, my firm did," said Scalia, a leading regulatory partner at Gibson Dunn and a former George W. Bush-era solicitor at the Labor Department. "It's something that would not have been tolerated by me or my firm or most of my clients."
Scalia, however, did not answer directly on whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against workers because of sexual orientation or transgender status. The U.S. Supreme Court will confront that dispute in three cases to be argued next month.
"We'll see what the court decides," Scalia told the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Congress and the states, he added, could take up legislation affecting the scope of protections against workplace discrimination in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision on the issue.
Scalia was pressed several times by Senate Democrats on the committee about a 1985 college article suggesting the LGBTQ lifestyle should not be treated as equally acceptable as other family lifestyles.
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut said the college article "trivialized the issues behind gay rights." Murphy also noted Scalia recently joined the board of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, an organization he said advocates against LGBTQ civil rights.
"Yes, I certainly have changed in how I view any number of things since I was in college. I think we've all matured—one would hope—since those days. I would certainly enforce the law in this area and respect the decisions of the Supreme Court," Scalia, who attended the University of Virginia as an undergraduate, told senators.
Scalia said at one point: "I wouldn't write those words today. I now have friends and colleagues to whom they would cause pain. I would not want to do that." He also said the Ethics and Public Policy organization is a respected organization and joining its board "says nothing about what my views are on any number of things." Scalia said in an ethics agreement that he would resign, on his confirmation, from the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
Scalia's personal views on LGBT rights appear to be in tension with the legal position taken in the three Supreme Court cases by the Trump administration's Justice Department.
The Justice Department is arguing that Title VII's ban on discrimination because of sex does not include sexual orientation or gender identity. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has concluded it does, and the agency did not sign the Justice Department's recent filing in the Supreme Court.
"With respect to the cases that are now in the Supreme Court, the Justice Department has taken one position. I don't know currently what position is being staked out by the EEOC, but I don't believe the Department of Labor has been called to present its views because it's not a statute administered by the department," Scalia said. He added: "Prejudice is abhorrent. It's not something I've tolerated that in my workplace."
Scalia pushed back on suggestions from Democrats that as a longtime corporate lawyer—he formerly led the labor team at Gibson Dunn—he would automatically disfavor the rights of workers. He said that his defense of corporate clients does not necessarily mean he personally believed in their cause.
He also said there was much of his work at Gibson Dunn that was behind the scenes. "I have advised clients to fire, or take other serious action, against executives and other managers who in my judgment engaged in harassment or other misconduct," Scalia said in his opening statement. "I have been direct and forceful in telling clients to take steps that, sometimes, they wished they did not have to."
The Senate committee is expected to vote next Tuesday on Scalia's nomination.
John Scalia, Son of the Late Justice, Returns to Greenberg Traurig
|Correction: An earlier version of this report misattributed a statement to Sen. Patty Murray. That statement was made by Sen. Chris Murphy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250