2 Key Lawyers in Whistleblower Saga Have Lauded Oversight. Now, They Are Divided
The two men have publicly split over whether a whistleblower complaint involving the Trump administration should be handed over to the House Intelligence Committee.
September 20, 2019 at 11:44 AM
8 minute read
A secret whistleblower complaint that has consumed Washington, D.C., is now dividing two top lawyers who have both previously backed Congress' right to obtain that kind of information.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is seeking the whistleblower complaint after the information wasn't shared with congressional committees despite it being labeled an "urgent" matter by the intelligence community's inspector general. But the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, bolstered by legal advice from the Department of Justice, argues the complaint is privileged and doesn't have to be shared with lawmakers overseeing intelligence matters.
Both Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson and Office of the Director of National Intelligence General Counsel Jason Klitenic backed Congress' oversight of the intelligence community during their confirmation hearings before the Senate in 2017.
Atkinson now says he believes the congressional intelligence committees should be able to access the complaint under a federal whistleblower statute. But Klitenic wrote in a letter this week that officials don't have to share it with Congress, arguing it doesn't meet the standard needed for disclosure.
Committee Democrats believe the whistleblower complaint is somehow connected to President Donald Trump and his administration, and are considering legal action to get the complaint.
From ex-intelligence officers to Justice Department veterans, here are the main attorneys involved in the unfolding legal drama.
>> Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson: The former Winston & Strawn partner spent roughly four hours meeting with the House Intelligence Committee behind closed doors Thursday. But, according to lawmakers present, he did not provide details of what the tipster told his office because he was not authorized by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to do so.
Atkinson disagrees with ODNI, and his thinking on the handling of the complaint was summed up in a letter released by the House Intelligence Committee Thursday. Atkinson said he is currently unable to fulfill two of his duties: informing the appropriate congressional committees of potential issues in the intelligence community and ensuring that the whistleblower's complaint is addressed.
That's in line with what Atkinson told Senators on the Intelligence Committee during his confirmation hearing in 2017.
"In terms of the whistleblower protection, I talked about a commitment to integrity and that to me is what is essential so that whistleblowers have trust in the process," he said.
Atkinson also testified that he views "the concept of congressional oversight of U.S. intelligence activities as an obligation of Congress and essential to ensure U.S. intelligence activities meet our nation's security needs, respect our laws and reflect American values."
Before Trump tapped Atkinson for the job, he spent 15 years at the DOJ. He started off as a trial attorney in the criminal division before serving as an assistant U.S. attorney for D.C. for a decade. Atkinson rounded out his time in the national security division, including a stint as senior counsel to the assistant attorney general.
At Winston & Strawn, Atkinson worked on white-collar defense cases and internal investigations from 1991 until 2002. His family is still heavily involved in Big Law: His wife, Kathryn Cameron Atkinson, was elected the new chairwoman of Miller & Chevalier in July, after she spent 27 years with the firm.
Atkinson praised his wife during his opening statement at his 2017 Senate confirmation hearing, thanking her for having "made her own personal and professional sacrifices to help me realize my professional goals."
His Senate questionnaire shows that his wife would commit to not taking on any work that would conflict with his oversight of the intelligence community.
Jason Klitenic, ODNI general counsel: Klitenic joined Holland & Knight in 2010 and led its national security team in Washington. Klitenic, who is the brother-in-law of FBI Director Christopher Wray, was also on the Trump transition team.
Klitenic got a shoutout from Wray at the FBI director's confirmation hearing in 2017, when Wray thanked Klitenic and his wife Kate by name.
"A commitment like this affects the whole family, and I have no words to adequately express my gratitude to all of them," Wray said at the time.
Klitenic in July 2017 reported receiving $828,483 from Holland & Knight in salary and bonus, according to his financial disclosure form.
He's no stranger to working with federal agencies, as Klitenic previously worked with the Homeland Security, State and Defense departments. Since joining ODNI, he's likely to have regularly coordinated with the Justice Department, as he has during the whistleblower controversy.
Klitenic is now in the spotlight for letters he wrote to the House and Senate Intelligence committees earlier this week, on behalf of ODNI. In the letters, he argued that a whistleblower complaint sought by the House panel did not have to be shared with Congress because it didn't reach the statutory standards needed for disclosure.
During his confirmation hearing in 2017, Klitenic told Senators in his opening statement: "I also believe strongly in my responsibility, if confirmed, to keep the Congress fully and currently informed and my responsibility to support your oversight over the IC. The IC's unique missions are often practiced in secrecy, to protect critical sources and methods in support of our national security."
>> Compass Rose Legal Group's Andrew Bakaj: The former CIA officer is representing the whistleblower, whose identity remains unknown.
The founding and managing partner of Compass Rose Legal Group, Bakaj previously worked at the CIA's Office of Inspector General, where he ran criminal and administrative probes. But more appropriately, he created a program to investigate instances of whistleblower reprisals.
Bakaj is a former whistleblower himself. He was forced out of the CIA after he filed a complaint in 2014 about alleged evidence tampering at the agency's inspector general office. It was later determined that Bakaj faced retaliation at the CIA over that complaint.
According to Bakaj's bio on his firm's website, he is a "subject matter expert" in whistleblower complaints. He also used to work with ODNI, the Defense Department and Justice Department in that role.
The attorney also previously oversaw investigations into retaliatory actions taken against civilian staffers at the Defense Department. While at DoD, Bakaj also created a framework used for the first federal probes into potential whistleblower reprisals.
The attorney also comes with Capitol Hill credentials, as he worked for then-Sens. Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Hillary Clinton, as well as now-Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
>> House general counsel Doug Letter: After being hired in January, Letter is quickly becoming a familiar face in courthouses handling the House's legal battles, not that he wasn't well-known there already, after spending roughly 40 years at the DOJ.
Schiff said Thursday that his panel is currently weighing its options with Letter, including whether they may go to court to obtain the whistleblower complaint.
If a legal fight is pursued over the complaint, it will add yet another case to Letter's already heavy caseload. The House counsel has been involved in nine cases since Speaker Nancy Pelosi hired him, including two lawsuits in which he is arguing as an amicus party.
But Letter has proved himself both an eager litigator and defender for the House. Seeking the complaint would also provide the House general counsel's office with a new kind of legal challenge, standing in stark contrast from the other lawsuits surrounding Trump's private financial records.
Read more:
US House Weighs Lawsuit Forcing Disclosure of Mystery Whistleblower Complaint
Miller & Chevalier Taps New Leader Ahead of 100-Year Milestone
In the 'Chaos': Stephen Boyd Is DOJ's Point Man as Democrats Dial Up Pressure
Jason Klitenic Discloses Salary, Clients in Advance of Nomination Hearing
Trump Picks Holland & Knight Partner, Brother-in-Law of FBI Director, for Intelligence Post
Former Whistleblower, Lawyer Start Free Law Firm for Federal Workers
Whistleblower Lawyers on Alert as Trump Establishes Message Control
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn-House Moves of the Month: Boeing Loses Another Lawyer, HubSpot Legal Chief Out After 2 Years
5 minute readAfter Regime Change, Syria Remains Liable in US Federal Courts for Alleged Assad-Era Terrorism Support
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 2PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 3Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 4'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 5'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250