White House Lawyers Worked to Obscure Memo of Trump's Ukraine Call, Whistleblower Claims
The whistleblower said they were told by unidentified officials that White House lawyers wanted to store a transcript of the president's call in a way to limit who could access it.
September 26, 2019 at 09:27 AM
4 minute read
White House lawyers "directed" officials to store records of a call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a way that would obscure that information from others who would normally be able to access it, including members of the Cabinet, according to a whistleblower complaint released Thursday.
In a redacted, declassified version of the complaint released by the House Intelligence Committee, the whistleblower wrote that they were told by White House officials that they "were deeply disturbed by what had transpired in the phone call."
"They told me that there was already a 'discussion ongoing' with White House lawyers about how to treat the call because of the likelihood, in the officials' retelling, that they had witnessed the President abuse his office for personal gain," the document reads.
The whistleblower wrote that they later "learned from multiple U.S. officials that senior White House officials had intervened to 'lock down' all records of the phone call, especially the official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced—as is customary—by the White House Situation Room."
"White House officials told me that they were 'directed' by White House lawyers to remove the electronic transcript from the computer system in which such transcripts are typically stored for coordination, finalization, and distribution to Cabinet-level officials," the complaint said.
Read the complaint:
The whistleblower said the transcript of the phone call was put into an electronic system "that is otherwise used to store and handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature."
"One White House official described this act as an abuse of this electronic system, because the call did not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective," the complaint reads.
The declassified version of the complaint was released shortly before acting director of National Intelligence Patrick Maguire began his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee about the complaint and its handling.
A memo on the call between Trump and Zelensky was released by the White House Thursday. It showed that Trump asked Zelensky to work with Attorney General William Barr and his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, to look into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden over the removal of an Ukrainian prosecutor.
Debunked reports alleged that the former vice president pressured Ukraine to remove the prosecutor because he was investigating the younger Biden, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian energy company. That prosecutor was alleged by global leaders as failing to adequately investigate allegations of corruption.
DOJ sought to distance Barr from the memo of Trump's call with several statements, saying Barr was never asked to investigate the Bidens and was unaware of Trump's conversation with Zelensky until it was referred to the department some weeks later.
The declassified whistleblower complaint also makes several references to Barr. It said Trump referred to Giuliani and Barr "as his personal envoys on these matters."
And it referenced several interviews by Ukrainian prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko given to The Hill publication earlier this year, including one in which Lutsenko said he "had spoken with Mr. Giuliani about arranging contact with Attorney General Barr."
Some Democrats, such as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-New York-are calling for Barr to recuse himself from the Ukrainian matters.
Read more:
'Do Us a Favor': Trump Wanted Barr, Giuliani to Help Ukraine Investigate Biden
Roberts, Like Rehnquist Before Him, Would Preside Over a Trump Impeachment Trial
2 Key Lawyers in Whistleblower Saga Have Lauded Oversight. Now, They Are Divided
Barry Berke Makes House Debut With Lewandowski as Democrats Push Impeachment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250