White House Lawyers Worked to Obscure Memo of Trump's Ukraine Call, Whistleblower Claims
The whistleblower said they were told by unidentified officials that White House lawyers wanted to store a transcript of the president's call in a way to limit who could access it.
September 26, 2019 at 09:27 AM
4 minute read
White House lawyers "directed" officials to store records of a call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a way that would obscure that information from others who would normally be able to access it, including members of the Cabinet, according to a whistleblower complaint released Thursday.
In a redacted, declassified version of the complaint released by the House Intelligence Committee, the whistleblower wrote that they were told by White House officials that they "were deeply disturbed by what had transpired in the phone call."
"They told me that there was already a 'discussion ongoing' with White House lawyers about how to treat the call because of the likelihood, in the officials' retelling, that they had witnessed the President abuse his office for personal gain," the document reads.
The whistleblower wrote that they later "learned from multiple U.S. officials that senior White House officials had intervened to 'lock down' all records of the phone call, especially the official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced—as is customary—by the White House Situation Room."
"White House officials told me that they were 'directed' by White House lawyers to remove the electronic transcript from the computer system in which such transcripts are typically stored for coordination, finalization, and distribution to Cabinet-level officials," the complaint said.
Read the complaint:
|The whistleblower said the transcript of the phone call was put into an electronic system "that is otherwise used to store and handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature."
"One White House official described this act as an abuse of this electronic system, because the call did not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective," the complaint reads.
The declassified version of the complaint was released shortly before acting director of National Intelligence Patrick Maguire began his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee about the complaint and its handling.
A memo on the call between Trump and Zelensky was released by the White House Thursday. It showed that Trump asked Zelensky to work with Attorney General William Barr and his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, to look into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden over the removal of an Ukrainian prosecutor.
Debunked reports alleged that the former vice president pressured Ukraine to remove the prosecutor because he was investigating the younger Biden, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian energy company. That prosecutor was alleged by global leaders as failing to adequately investigate allegations of corruption.
DOJ sought to distance Barr from the memo of Trump's call with several statements, saying Barr was never asked to investigate the Bidens and was unaware of Trump's conversation with Zelensky until it was referred to the department some weeks later.
The declassified whistleblower complaint also makes several references to Barr. It said Trump referred to Giuliani and Barr "as his personal envoys on these matters."
And it referenced several interviews by Ukrainian prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko given to The Hill publication earlier this year, including one in which Lutsenko said he "had spoken with Mr. Giuliani about arranging contact with Attorney General Barr."
Some Democrats, such as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-New York-are calling for Barr to recuse himself from the Ukrainian matters.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250