'Unprecedented': Intel Chief Defends White House, DOJ Involvement in Handling Whistleblower Complaint
Acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire said the president's involvement in the underlying issue required him to see if executive privilege covered the whistleblower complaint.
September 26, 2019 at 03:14 PM
5 minute read
When acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire started his new job, the inspector general of the intelligence community was already in possession of a whistleblower complaint that would set Democrats on the path to launching a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
Just six weeks into his new role, Maguire made his debut before the House Intelligence Committee, defending not only his handling of that whistleblower complaint but the whistleblower themselves.
During the nearly three-hour hearing, Maguire made it clear he believed he had no choice but to consult with White House attorneys and the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, despite White House lawyers being implicated in the complaint, which he described as "unprecedented."
Labeling it a "unique situation," Maguire said the president's involvement invoked other concerns that typically wouldn't be present in handling such a complaint, like whether claims of executive privilege could be made over parts of the report.
"I thought it would be prudent to ensure that it met the statute before I sent it forward," he said.
But Democrats on the committee questioned why Maguire went to the bodies directly mentioned in the complaint for guidance on how to handle the matter.
"So you went to the subject of the complaint for advice first on whether you should provide the complaint to Congress?" Schiff asked.
Maguire disputed that characterization. Maguire said he asked the White House about whether the conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky fell under the scope of executive privilege and that no one directed him at any point to not provide the complaint to Congress.
He also maintained he did not ignore a subpoena from the House Intelligence Committee to hand over the complaint, putting distance between himself and other current or former administration officials who have defied subpoenas.
Democrats repeatedly said Maguire "withheld" the report from them by not sharing it within seven days as required by federal whistleblower law, after Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson deemed it an "urgent" matter. Some members suggested that, had Atkinson not notified them of the complaint, they would have never learned of it in the first place.
But Maguire disputed that characterization, saying he simply "delayed" providing Congress with the report in order to resolve the issues covered by executive privilege. He said the OLC opinion meant he did not have to comply with the time restrictions included in the statute.
And he said the complaint wasn't "being swept under the rug" because it was referred to the Justice Department. DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement Tuesday that the potential campaign finance violations were referred to the agency, but that no charges were being pursued.
A declassified, partially redacted version of the whistleblower complaint was released just ahead of Thursday's hearing. It alleged that Trump asked Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, and that several White House officials tried to cover it up.
A memo documenting the call was released by the White House on Wednesday. Trump's actions pushed Speaker Nancy Pelosi to declare that the House is formally pursuing an impeachment inquiry.
In a series of final questions to Maguire, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff aimed to get what the House failed to get from former special counsel Robert Mueller—an explicit statement that Congress is now the best body to move forward in investigating allegations of wrongdoing by the president.
Mueller laid out several instances of potential obstruction of justice in his final report but did not make a charging decision. Attorney General William Barr said he determined the matter should be referred to DOJ and declined to pursue it further, angering Democrats who argued it should be taken up by Congress instead.
When Schiff asked Maguire if he believed the committee should take up the investigation, the intelligence chief replied, "The horse is already out of the barn."
Maguire said lawmakers have "all the information" they need, and the investigatory burden now falls on their shoulders.
Schiff signalled that the committee may call in others cited in the whistleblower complaint. And he called on others who were firsthand witnesses to the events described by the whistleblower to come forward.
"I would just say to those several others that have knowledge of these events, I hope that they too would show the same kind of courage" as the whistleblower, Schiff said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250