Dentons Preps for Trial in $10M Fee Suit Against Republic of Guinea
A team from Williams & Connolly is advocating for Dentons, which sued Guinea in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2014. A trial judge recently denied Guinea's motion for summary judgment.
October 09, 2019 at 06:31 PM
4 minute read
More than five years after the law firm Dentons sued the Republic of Guinea, claiming the West African country had failed to pay more than $10 million in legal fees, a federal judge Wednesday pressed the two sides to prepare for a trial in early 2020—and to consider the "pure economics" of a settlement.
At a hearing in Washington, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss of the District of Columbia appeared eager to bring the fee dispute to a conclusion, suggesting that a bench trial begin early next year. When a defense lawyer for Guinea, Schertler & Onorato partner David Dickieson, said complications with taking depositions in Europe could push the trial to the summer, Moss balked at the suggestion.
"That's pretty far out," Moss said.
"It seems we ought to be able to get that done in less than nine months," he added.
Moss set an Oct. 16 deadline for Dickieson and Dentons' lawyer, Williams & Connolly partner Ana Reyes, to propose a schedule for pretrial proceedings.
In the years-long dispute, Guinea has argued it should be protected against the lawsuit under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a federal law that establishes the circumstances under which foreign governments are shielded from litigation in U.S. courts.
The hearing Wednesday came a month after Moss rejected Guinea's latest bid to get the law firm's claims dismissed.
In August 2017, Dickieson argued Guinea's engagement letters with Dentons were invalid because they were signed by the country's minister of mines, who lacked authority to approve public contracts. Under Guinean procurement law, only the minister of finance at the time, Kerfalla Yansané, would have had authority to approve the contract. (Yansane is now Guinea's ambassador to the U.S.)
Dickieson said Dentons could not use the engagement letters to claim that its work for Guinea fell under the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act's exception for commercial activity.
In September, Moss denied Guinea's request for summary judgment, ruling that there is "no dispute that Guinea requested and accepted extensive legal services from Dentons."
Dentons, the world's largest law firm by the number of lawyers, ranked No. 6 on the latest American Lawyer Global 100, with $2.4 billion in gross revenue.
The fee dispute stems from Guinea's plans to develop large iron ore mines in the southeastern region of the country. As part of that effort, known as the Simandou Project, Dentons was hired in 2012 to provide legal services in connection with the mining project and negotiations with one of its investors, Rio Tinto.
The Dentons team was led by Jonathan Cahn, who has since become a partner at Reed Smith. In court Wednesday, Reyes said Cahn expects to be available for questioning early next year in the proceedings.
In its 2014 complaint, Dentons said its invoices totaled more than $12 million, but Guinea had only paid the firm $2 million.
Guinea has argued in a counterclaim against Dentons that the law firm charged "outrageously inflated" fees and failed to live up to its promise to obtain outside funding for its legal work.
Dickieson on Wednesday said Dentons had tucked language into the "fineprint" of its retainer agreements allowing it to seek payment from Guinea if it could not secure that third-party funding.
At one point, Moss urged the two sides to consider a settlement and the "pure economics" of avoiding further costs in a dispute over legal fees.
Dickieson said that attempts at a settlement have been complicated by the financial condition of Guinea, an impoverished country that was ravaged by the Ebola epidemic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Onerous Speech Code'?: Wiley Rein Says Md. Green Power Law Violates 1st Amendment Rights
3 minute readFTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute read'Arbitrary and Capricious'?: Federal Judge Nullifies Gulf Coast Big Oil Assessment
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250