Donald Dunner, Giant of Patent Appeals, Dies at 88
The Finnegan Henderson partner argued in the neighborhood of 175 appeals to the Federal Circuit, a court he played a role in launching.
October 16, 2019 at 09:18 PM
4 minute read
Donald Dunner, the dean of the D.C. patent appellate bar and a name partner at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, died Wednesday, according to published reports. He was 88.
"He was a giant, a colossus in the field of patent law with no equal," said Paul Michel, a former chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dunner was part of the Carter administration commission that recommended the formation of the Federal Circuit to hear patent appeals, and he testified to Congress in support of its creation. He argued close to 175 appeals to the appellate court over his career—thought to be the most by any individual—and was the author of a leading treatise on Federal Circuit practice.
And, Michel said only half-jokingly, he was "the leader of every organization in the entire patent universe" at one time or another. That included the American Intellectual Property Law Association (1979-80), the ABA's Section of Intellectual Property Law (1995-96) and the Bar Association of the District of Columbia's IP section in 1964-65.
Dunner also was known for his unfailing courtly demeanor. "Dunner always had a grace and elegance that set him apart," Gene Quinn wrote in reporting the news of Dunner's passing on his IP Watchdog blog. "He was a friend to judges and politicians, as well as a mentor to countless attorneys."
That was especially true at Finnegan. "For more than four decades, Don was a mentor, a teacher, and an inspiration to many of us who sought to learn his craft of appellate advocacy," Finnegan appellate partner James Barney said in an email.
Dunner demanded perfection and encouraged his colleagues to dig deeper and think bigger about every issue, Barney said. "He was never satisfied with a first draft, a second, or a third. In fact, drafting briefs for Don could be downright daunting! But along the way, he imparted wisdom to those eager to learn, he explained the nuts and bolts of appellate advocacy, and made us all proud to be part of the process.
"Don was everything I ever aspired to be as a lawyer—and still do," Barney added.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges partner Edward Reines said Dunner was the consummate professional and the ultimate Federal Circuit advocate. "I had the privilege to face him at trial and on appeal and am a better advocate and person for it," Reines said.
Dunner grew up in Brooklyn, New York, and majored in chemical engineering at Purdue University. After two years in the Army, he began studying law at Georgetown University while working as a patent examiner at the USPTO then as a law clerk the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, a predecessor court of the Federal Circuit.
He began practicing appellate law at Diggins & LeBlanc during the 1960s. He told Washington Lawyer in 2009 that it appealed to him because "it is a very civilized practice. … The cases take a matter of months, rather than years, you end up working hard to prepare and make an oral argument, and you get your highs in 15-minute doses."
He later worked at Lane, Aitken, Dunner & Ziems, and joined Finnegan Henderson in 1978 when it numbered just 30 lawyers.
Dunner's wins at the Federal Circuit include the 2009 affirmance of his client i4i Inc.'s $290 million patent infringement judgment against Microsoft Corp. He also obtained the reversal of an $80 million patent infringement award against Mattel Inc., in connection with its Hot Wheels brand. In 2014, Dunner argued his first case before the U.S. Supreme Court, the attorneys fee case Highmark v. Allcare, even getting into some needling with Chief Justice John Roberts about their billing rates when both were members of the D.C. bar.
"I was surprised by how relaxed I was during the process," Dunner told The American Lawyer in 2014, "but you could say I've been preparing for that moment my whole career."
He is survived by his wife, Jenny Sue, two daughters and three grandchildren.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Trending Stories
- 1How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 2Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 3Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 4Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250