Trump Poised to Flip 11th Circuit After Nominees Cruise Through Confirmation Hearing
Florida Justices Barbara Lagoa and Robert Luck faced little pushback from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee during their nomination hearing.
October 16, 2019 at 01:01 PM
4 minute read
A pair of Florida State Supreme Court justices are poised for a smooth Senate confirmation to seats on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
Justices Barbara Lagoa and Robert J. Luck faced little pushback from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee during their nomination hearing Wednesday morning, as they fielded questions about "judicial activism" and how they would approach precedent as members of the federal judiciary.
President Donald Trump tapped both justices last month for seats on the circuit. That announcement came shortly after speculation began that the circuit will shift to the right, as Judges Stanley Marcus and Gerald Tjoflat take senior status, an outcome that seems likely to take place after Wednesday's relatively uneventful hearing.
A handful of the committee's Democrats—Sens. Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris and Cory Booker—were at the Democratic debate in Ohio the night before and did not attend Wednesday's hearing. Sen. Chris Coons, another member of the panel, also attended the debate and did not question the nominees.
Senate Judiciary Republicans took the lead, asking the nominees about what they believed to be a "judicial activist," and how they might interpret the U.S. Constitution as they consider federal laws.
"The definition of a judicial activist is a judge who rules based on their personal preference or policy preference regardless of what the law calls for," Lagoa said.
Lagoa said there have been times when she personally disagreed with an opinion she wrote, but that she felt bound by what statutes say in issuing her rulings.
When asked about how legislative history should be used in judiciary rulings, Luck said he struggles with using legislative history as a main point in determining the intent of a statute, because a single statement by one lawmaker is not necessarily approved by Congress.
"The text is what is passed by the Congress," he said.
Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham also noted that both nominees, as members of an appeals court, could have the opportunity to overturn precedent.
"If somebody is challenging precedent, you'll give them their day in court?" Graham asked. Both nominees said they "absolutely" would.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, one of the few Democrats to question the nominees, applauded Lagoa's nomination. He noted the significance of appointing a Latina woman to counter a lack of diversity on the federal bench.
"The fact of the matter is only 6.6% of federal judges are of Latino or Hispanic heritage or descent," Blumenthal said. "In a country where more than 18% of our population is Latino or Hispanic, we should be doing more to attract nominees with that qualification."
Lagoa also invoked her parents' experience of fleeing Cuba to come to the U.S. as guiding her judicial interpretations.
"Unlike the country my parents fled, we are a nation of laws, not of men," Lagoa said.
Lagoa also gave her father-in-law, U.S. District Judge Paul Huck of the Southern District of Florida, a shout-out during her opening statement, saying she has looked to him as "a model of what a judge should be."
The state justice referred to her parents' experience again when Sen. Ted Cruz asked the nominees why judges should uphold the original meaning of the Constitution when it was written by "people who have been dead for 200 years."
Luck said that if judges stray away from the original meaning of the Constitution, it could open the door to a wide range of perspectives on the law, which "means every single person has a different way of viewing something" and create confusion for litigants.
And Lagoa replied that she believed it is important to uphold those original meanings in order to make sure that the law can be evenly applied over time, which she said was not the case in Cuba.
"To paraphrase 'Jerry Maguire,' you had me at 'this is not Cuba,'" Cruz joked.
"You had me at hello," Graham added.
Correction: This story has been updated to correct the name of Robert Luck.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Importance of Plaintiffs Not Letting Defendants Dictate Settlement Tax Strategies
- 2A New State Law Is a Positive Step Forward for Judicial Security in Pennsylvania—But More Action Is Needed
- 3Does the FAAAA Preempt State Negligence Claims Against Freight Brokers?
- 4People in the News—Nov. 14, 2024—Cummins, McNees
- 5County Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250