The False Claims Act imposes treble damages for any losses the federal government “sustains because of” fraud. But how do courts tell when the government suffers losses “because of” fraud? This question can prove surprisingly complex in mortgage fraud cases under the FCA, and it does not arise in other mortgage litigation, such as cases pursuing repurchase remedies under a pooling and servicing agreement.

Until recently, federal circuit courts appeared divided on the causation standard for mortgage fraud claims under the FCA. But a recent Fifth Circuit decision in United States v. Hodge clarifies the standard and brings the circuits into alignment. By allowing proof of causation at a higher level of generality, it also paves the way for the government and private relators to bring FCA claims in cases with large numbers of misstatements. 

The Federal Housing Authority’s Mortgage Insurance Program

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]