Consumer Class Actions Nearly Tripled in the Past Decade, Report Says
Data privacy and unwanted text messages were among the claims in a rising number of consumer class actions, according to an inaugural report released Wednesday by Lex Machina.
October 23, 2019 at 07:39 PM
5 minute read
The number of consumer protection class actions has nearly tripled in the past decade, with cases over data privacy and unwanted text messages behind the increase, according to a report compiled by Lex Machina.
The "Consumer Protection Litigation Report," released Wednesday, is the first of its kind by Lex Machina, a unit of LexisNexis, that tracks consumer protection lawsuits filed in federal courts.
Overall, the number of consumer protection lawsuits rose by less than 20% from 2009 through 2018, with a collective 132,000 awarding $34 billion in damages over the past decade. In a webinar Wednesday, Laura Hopkins, a legal data expert at Lex Machina, said she predicted that 2019 would see similar numbers.
Class actions, however, rose much higher, from 1,223 to 3,382 filings, in the same timeframe. Hopkins attributed much of that increase to a rise in data breach cases.
"You could classify that as more catastrophic events are happening to a large group of people," she said. "There's more liability in data breach cases, and higher expectations for data security. Also, plaintiffs are seeing that if they come together, they have a little more traction or leverage and media exposure from class actions."
The most popular places to file consumer lawsuits was the Eastern District of New York, which had 3,558 filings from 2016 to 2018, of which 2,102 were class actions. Other top venues were the Middle District of Florida, ranked at No. 3, which had the most Telephone Consumer Protection Act cases, and the Northern District of Georgia, at No. 5, which had the highest number of Fair Credit Reporting Act cases. Other top districts were in California and New Jersey.
The report looked at cases based on specific federal statutes. Those alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, for instance, rose 740%, and those asserting Fair Credit Reporting Act claims increased by more than 150%, according to a report.
Hopkins said newer TCPA lawsuits focus on text messages sent to cellphones. As to the FCRA claims, she said, consumers have a higher expectation of keeping their data private.
"People are accessing their credit reports more and taking more ownership of that data," she said.
The report also looked at cases brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Truth in Lending Act or other federal consumer protection statutes, such as the Federal Trade Commission Act or Consumer Financial Protection Act.
According to the report, Truth in Lending Act cases fell more than 800% since 2009, which was the height of the mortgage crisis. Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuits also fell but still made up 72% of consumer protection claims filed in the past decade.
The report also ranked the top law firms handling consumer protection cases on both sides. Atlas Consumer Law, based in Lombard, Illinois, filed the largest number: 1,593 cases from 2016 to 2018.
In an emailed statement, firm partner James Vlahakis said, "As reflected by the data compiled by Lex Machina, there is a correlation between an increase in consumer protection litigation filings and diminished governmental enforcement actions. Further, increased collection and credit reporting activities have resulted in more consumers turning to private attorneys to enforce their statutory rights. After bringing certain cases to trial and focusing our efforts on the discovery process, we reaffirmed our belief that the federal judicial system is the best venue to balance the scales of justice."
No. 2 in number of filings was Lemberg Law, based in Wilton, Connecticut, and Garden City, New York's Sanders Barshay Grossman landed at No. 3. Morgan & Morgan, ranked No. 4 overall, filed the most TCPA cases, while the Law Offices of Todd D. Friedman, based in Beverly Hills, California, filed the most class actions.
On the defense side, Jones Day topped the list, defending 2,229 filings from 2016 to 2018 and handling the most FCRA cases. Jones Day represents Experian Information Solutions Inc., which faced 3,115 consumer cases from 2010 to 2018. Atlanta's King & Spalding, which ranked No. 5 with 1,217 filings, represents Equifax Information Services LLC, the No. 1 defendant in consumer protection lawsuits, with more than 4,000 cases filed under the FCRA from 2016 to 2018. Sessions, Fishman, Nathan & Israel, based in New Orleans, defended the most class actions and TCPA cases.
The damages figures in the report distinguished between those in judgments, often reached by the Federal Trade Commission, and those from class action settlements. In 2016 and 2017, the $14.7 billion that Volkswagen paid to settle lawsuits and government actions over its "clean diesel" vehicles influenced much of the damages totals from judgments.
The largest class action settlement from 2016 to 2018 was a $142 million deal that Wells Fargo & Co. paid to resolve claims that it opened bank accounts without the consent of nearly 3 million of its customers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConfusion Over New SEC Cyber Rules Leading Firms to Overstate Attack Readiness
'Issues That Have to Be Addressed': New Study Finds Flaws in Reporting Federal Judicial Sexual Misconduct
6 minute readBankruptcy Filings Surged in First Half of 2024 Amid Uptick in Big Chapter 11 Cases
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 2Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 3Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 4When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250