Judge Pierces Mueller Report Secrecy, Orders Material Disclosed to House Democrats
In a 75-page opinion, Howell dismissed Justice Department claims that redacted portions of the report should remain secret due to ongoing criminal cases stemming from Mueller's probe.
October 25, 2019 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge on Friday ordered the U.S. Justice Department to disclose to House Democrats secret portions of the special counsel's report on the Russia investigation, along with other materials concealed under grand secrecy rules, in a decision that pointed to the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell's ruling delivered a victory to the House Judiciary Committee in its drawn-out legal battle for the full findings of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III, who in March concluded his two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. In his summary of his office's findings, Mueller reported that he uncovered no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Kremlin, but he documented several episodes of possible efforts by the president to obstruct the investigation.
In a 75-page opinion, Howell, nominated by President Barack Obama in 2010, pointed to the House Democrats' ongoing impeachment inquiry as a "judicial process" that falls under an exception to grand jury secrecy rules, allowing Congress to access some of the most sensitive testimony and other information obtained by Mueller's team.
Several weeks ago, the House formally initiated an impeachment inquiry focused on President Donald Trump's alleged use of his office for personal gain. House investigators are looking into, among other things, whether Trump improperly leveraged U.S. military aid to pressure the president of Ukraine to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
"In carrying out the weighty constitutional duty of determining whether impeachment of the president is warranted, Congress need not redo the nearly two years of effort spent on the Special Counsel's investigation, nor risk being misled by witnesses, who may have provided information to the grand jury and the special counsel that varies from what they tell [the House Judiciary Committee]," Howell wrote.
Howell, who as chief judge presides over grand jury matters in Washington federal court, cited the public's substantial interest in the Mueller probe in ruling for the House Judiciary Committee, or HJC.
She dismissed Justice Department claims that redacted portions of the report should remain secret due to ongoing criminal cases stemming from Mueller's probe.
"The need for continued secrecy is minimal and thus easily outweighed by HJC's compelling need for the material," the judge said. "Tipping the scale even further toward disclosure is the public's interest in a diligent and thorough investigation into, and in a final determination about, potentially impeachable conduct by the president described in the Mueller Report."
The House Judiciary Committee, Howell said, "needs the requested material not only to investigate fully but also to reach a final determination about conduct by the President described in the Mueller Report."
The House Judiciary Committee voted in May to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt over his refusal to furnish the panel with a full, unredacted copy of the special counsel's 448 page report. In negotiations with House leaders, the Justice Department's top congressional liaison, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, agreed to make all but the grand jury information—"98.5 percent" of the Mueller report, he wrote in one letter—available to a dozen lawmakers.
In a statement Friday, the committee's chairman, U.S. Rep. Jerrod Nadler, said he was "gratified" by Howell's ruling.
"The court's thoughtful ruling recognizes that our impeachment inquiry fully comports with the Constitution and thoroughly rejects the spurious White House claims to the contrary," he said. "This grand jury information that the administration has tried to block the House from seeing will be critical to our work."
Howell gave the government until Oct. 30 to release to the House the redacted portions of Mueller's report.
Read Howell's full opinion below:
Read more:
Impeachment, Lawyers and the Views from the War Rooms
Trump Lawyers Set the Stage for Supreme Court to Rule on Mazars Subpoena
Judge Wants Quick Public Disclosure of Any Giuliani Ukraine Docs
Law School Classmates Blast Trump Counsel Cipollone Over Impeachment Stance
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute read‘Undermines the Rule of Law’: Retired US Judges Condemn Trump’s Jan. 6 Pardons
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readSCOTUSblog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 2Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 3SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
- 4Sidley Hires Paul Hastings Energy Finance Partner in Houston
- 5Potential Pitfalls in Arbitrating Religious Disputes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250