November Editor's Note: Lawyers Past and Present Discuss Impeachment + Our 2019 Appellate Hot List
NLJ Editor-in-Chief Lisa Helem on highlights in the NLJ's November issue, including a cover story by federal courts reporter, Jacqueline Thomsen.
October 25, 2019 at 03:00 PM
3 minute read
Impeachment. These days it's impossible to go an hour without hearing the word on cable news, along with evolving analysis on how the U.S. House might proceed with its inquiry of President Donald Trump.
In brainstorming about our November cover issue, we wanted to delve into the perspectives lawyers can lend on how the impeachment process unfolds. What gems can key attorneys from past impeachment proceedings offer us about the grueling hours and the massive amount of documents involved? What happens behind the scenes? And what are constitutional law scholars saying about the road ahead?
Fortunately, Jacqueline Thomsen, who joined our Washington, D.C., office in August, was eager to dig in.
"It was great to learn more about the impeachment experiences of these attorneys that make them expert voices on the proceedings we're seeing play out right now, " said Thomsen, who covers courts and the legal side of politics. For more, check out our cover story.
Next, we are excited to announce our 2019 Appellate Hot List. The appellate luminaries featured in this year's special report won key matters before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of appeal, staying true to their practice philosophies along the way. They recount how they tackled appeals involving everything from racial gerrymandering to RICO. They also share what they believe are the most satisfying elements of appellate practice. For Williams & Connolly's Lisa Blatt, the answer is pretty simple: "Winning." Blatt, at press time, has argued 37 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, more than any other woman in U.S. history.
These esteemed advocates also weigh in on the most valuable lessons they learned as young attorneys. Hogan Lovells' Neal Katyal in 2017 surpassed Thurgood Marshall's record for the most Supreme Court arguments by a minority lawyer with 35. At press time, Katyal has argued 39 cases. He shares this: "Take risks. Prepare relentlessly for them. But take them."
And WilmerHale's Danielle Spinelli offers this: "Stretch beyond your comfort zone [and] don't hesitate to take the lead even if the leaders you see don't look like you."
Indeed. For more jewels from these appellate heavyweights, check out our special report. Elsewhere in this month's issue, read about the latest in legal moves from government to private pratice in Revolving Door, and from around the globe in Movers.
As always, we love to hear from you. Email me at the address below or tweet me @lhelemNLJ. Thanks for reading!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLJ December/January Editor's Note: What's Driving White Collar Defense and Antitrust Anxieties
2 minute readApril Editor's Note: Gearing up for Regulatory Action & Why Judges Leave the Bench
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250