New Lawsuit Alleges Illegal 'Shadow' Ukraine Diplomacy at Trump's Direction
"State Department officials charged with carrying out our foreign policy should not be left in the dark about shadow diplomacy carried out through a secret, alternative channel," the complaint reads.
November 05, 2019 at 03:05 PM
4 minute read
A new lawsuit is alleging that top State Department officials violated record-keeping laws by using "secret" channels to discuss diplomatic moves on Ukraine, specifically President Donald Trump's desire for Ukrainian officials to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his family.
In the complaint filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the groups Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, the National Security Archive and the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations asked for a court order requiring the State Department to preserve the communications.
"State Department officials charged with carrying out our foreign policy should not be left in the dark about shadow diplomacy carried out through a secret, alternative channel," the complaint reads. "Creating records of U.S. foreign policy is essential to ensure that the critical checks and balances built into our system function as the founders intended, and that the public, private researchers, and historians have access to the full documentary history of this administration."
The complaint, citing media reports, claims that the State Department officials used the secret channels to communicate "at the direction of" Trump and his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani.
It also alleges that some officials, including Giuliani, former special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker and top Ukrainian diplomat William "Bill" Taylor, used the encrypted messaging app WhatsApp to communicate.
It pointed in particular to texts between Taylor and Volker in arguing that the secret, illegal channel existed, and noted the texts weren't obtained by the State Department until they were subpoenaed by Congress.
"These text messages further evidence the irregular or shadow diplomacy channel that was used to, among other things, place pressure on Ukraine 'to deliver on the President's demand for Ukraine to launch politically motivated investigations,'" the complaint reads.
Trump's efforts to push Ukraine to investigate the Bidens are now the subject of an impeachment inquiry in the U.S. House of Representatives. Congressional investigators have deposed Volker and Taylor as part of that inquiry.
How the Trump administration has documented its effort to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens will test the reach of federal records laws, as the White House has faced early claims of trying to suppress the rough transcript of Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The lawsuit does not seek the immediate release of the records. Rather, it requests that they be preserved so they can be released in the future through Freedom of Information Act requests and other methods.
"The failure of Secretary Pompeo and State Department officials to create and preserve records of their conversations and meetings with certain foreign leaders and of their diplomatic efforts conducted through a secret, irregular channel outside of the agency's recordkeeping system have deprived and will continue to deprive the Plaintiffs of access to the documentary history of this administration," the lawsuit said.
"In the process, Plaintiffs and other members of the American public will lose vital information and insight into State Department policies and decision making, which are critical to interpret and prevent illegal or unwise government action."
Attorneys for CREW filed the suit, as did Baker McKenzie lawyers George M. Clarke III and Mireille Oldak.
This complaint echoes another previously filed by CREW over records on Trump's contacts with foreign leaders. That suit also did not seek the immediate release of those records, but claimed that Trump's office was violation of record-keeping law and sought a court order to preserve the documents.
In a court filing last month, Justice Department attorneys committed to maintaining those records for the duration of that litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 2Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
- 3Squire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
- 4Womans Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 5More Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250