DC Circuit Judges Rao, Griffith and Rogers Will Weigh Release of Mueller Grand Jury Materials
Two Republican-appointed judges and one Democratic appointee will oversee the appeal.
November 07, 2019 at 04:16 PM
4 minute read
Updated on Nov. 8
A federal appeals court in Washington has set a Nov. 18 hearing to consider a trial judge's order validating the House's impeachment inquiry and requiring the U.S. Justice Department to disclose now-secret grand jury materials that were part of the special counsel's Russia investigation.
Two Republican-appointed judges—Neomi Rao and Thomas Griffith—and one Democratic appointee, Judith Rogers, will preside at Tuesday's hearing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Rao, appointed by President Donald Trump, last month voted in dissent against House Democrats in a dispute over a subpoena that was issued to Trump's longtime accounting firm for copies of his financial records.
Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia issued a 75-page ruling Oct. 25 siding with the House Judiciary Committee in its quest to obtain the full findings of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III, who in March concluded his two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. In his summary of his office's findings, Mueller reported that he uncovered no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Kremlin, but he documented several episodes of possible efforts by the president to obstruct the investigation.
Howell, who as chief judge presides over grand jury matters in Washington federal court, cited the public's substantial interest in the Mueller probe in ruling for the House Judiciary Committee. She rejected Main Justice's claim that the redacted portions should remain secret due to ongoing criminal cases stemming from Mueller's probe.
With limited exception, grand jury material is shielded from the public. One exception allows judges to release grand jury information "preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding." Howell spurned the Justice Department's argument that the House's ongoing impeachment inquiry and would-be impeachment trial in the Senate do not amount to a "judicial proceeding."
"Contrary to DOJ's position—and as historical practice, the Federalist Papers, the text of the Constitution, and Supreme Court precedent all make clear—impeachment trials are judicial in nature and constitute judicial proceedings," Howell wrote in her order.
The D.C. Circuit's order Wednesday allotted 15 minutes of argument time for the House and for the Justice Department. Neither side has yet said who will argue in the appeals court, where an array of Trump-related cases have been resolved or are pending.
The full appeals court is weighing whether to rehear its 2-1 ruling that Trump's accounting firm, Mazars USA, must respond to a House subpoena seeking Trump financial records. The appeals court is also considering whether the House Oversight Committee can get access to documents about Trump's downtown D.C. hotel. Trump has faced scrutiny over whether profits from his vast business empire violate the Constitution's ban on presidents receiving "emoluments," or gifts.
Rogers and Griffith are veterans of the D.C. Circuit. Rogers has served since the Clinton administration, and Griffith since the George W. Bush administration. All three judges—Rao, Rogers and Griffth—are fairly active on the bench at oral arguments, engaging often with the lawyers appearing before them.
The judges' ruling in the dispute over Mueller grand jury materials ultimately, like any case, could go before the full bench, or be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices haven't yet had occasion to rule on any impeachment-related disputes, or any dispute involving Trump's financial records.
Read more:
'This Is Not Normal': US Judge Denounces Trump's Attacks on Judiciary
'Let's Motor Through, Chairman': How Robert Luskin Guided Gordon Sondland
Trump Lawyers Set the Stage for Supreme Court to Rule on Mazars Subpoena
DC Circuit Upholds Democrats' Subpoena for Trump's Financial Records
A Judge Didn't Sound Eager to Throw Out House Suit Seeking Trump Tax Returns
Trump Can't Block NY Grand Jury Subpoena Seeking Tax Records: 2nd Circuit
The court on Friday rescheduled oral argument to Nov. 18.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250