Milbank Partner Up for Calif. District Court Seat Reports Firm Salary of $3+ Million
Mark Scarsi, the managing partner of the firm's Los Angeles office who has been nominated to the federal bench, disclosed that he made $3.3 million in partnership income in 2018 and $3.5 million in 2017.
November 14, 2019 at 06:55 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A Milbank partner who's been nominated for a seat on the federal bench reported $3.3 million in partnership income from the law firm in 2018, according to financial disclosure forms filed with the U.S. Senate.
The disclosure filed by Mark Scarsi, the managing partner of the law firm's Los Angeles office, offers a rare peek into partnership income at Milbank given the dearth of its lawyers who have jumped to the Trump administration. At least one other Milbank nominee has filed a financial disclosure under the Trump administration.
That lawyer, Austin Bramwell, reported earning just under $2 million from his partnership share between 2016 and June 2017. Bramwell went on to be a senior adviser in the Office of Tax Policy at the Treasury Department before returning to Milbank in early 2018 as a partner in the trust and estates group.
Scarsi's 2018 income as an equity partner was down slightly from the $3.5 million he received in 2017, according to his disclosure, which is a standard filing for all federal judicial nominees.
The American Lawyer reported that profits per equity partner at Milbank were $3.8 million in 2018 and $3.5 million in 2017.
Scarsi, who had stints at O'Melveny & Myers and Christie Parker & Hale prior to joining Milbank in 2007, has gotten sign off from both of his Democratic home state senators. Scarsi appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee for his confirmation hearing Wednesday.
Here are three other things to know about Scarsi:
>> How he got the nomination
Scarsi sent his resume to the White House Counsel's office in April 2017 indicating that he'd be interested in being considered for a district court judgeship. He met with Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, in June 2017 and had interviews with the White House Counsel's Office and DOJ's Office of Legal Policy in August 2017. He submitted an application to Sen. Dianne Feinstein's selection committee shortly thereafter and to Sen. Kamala Harris' committee that March 2018 after it re-formed. After formal DOJ vetting began in summer 2018, Scarsi was nominated to the bench in October 2018. He was interviewed by Harris' committee afterward, on Dec. 18, 2018.
>> His work at Milbank
Among Scarsi's notable clients is Cambridge Analytica, whom he represented in the consumer privacy class actions filed on behalf of Facebook users in the wake of the political firm's harvesting of data from the social media network. Scarsi has also represented both Apple and Google in patent litigation. His disclosures highlight a pair of patent jury trial wins for Apple in back-to-back months in 2013, one in the Central District of California and another in the Eastern District of Texas. In the Google case included in the disclosures, Scarsi's team won a ruling from a judge in the District of Delaware that the asserted patent was invalid.
On the pro bono front, Scarsi dedicated about 80 hours representing an "elderly individual" in Landlord/Tenant Court who had fallen victim to "a reverse mortgage sham transaction." He also spent about 40 hours representing a transgender individual seeking asylum based on her inability to return to her country of origin, among other matters.
>>His affiliations
Among other professional associations, Scarsi joined the Federalist Society in 2017. That same year the attorney also joined the Republican National Lawyers Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250