Steven Menashi's Confirmation Flips Second Circuit to GOP-Appointed Majority
The Senate confirmed Menashi 51 to 41, largely along party lines.
November 14, 2019 at 02:29 PM
4 minute read
The Senate on Thursday confirmed Steven Menashi to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, bringing an end to a confirmation battle that at times drew ire from members of both parties toward the judicial nominee.
The Senate confirmed Menashi 51 to 41, largely along party lines. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, broke with her party to vote against the nominee. Menashi's confirmation flips the Second Circuit to a majority of Republican appointees.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking on the Senate floor ahead of Menashi's vote, said the nominee had advanced from the Senate Judiciary Committee "on the basis of strong academic and legal qualifications," including "experience in both teaching and practicing law
"I would urge all of our colleagues to vote to confirm this impressive nominee this afternoon," McConnell said.
However, Democrats have been highly critical of Menashi, citing his past writings and actions as counsel at both the U.S. Education Department and the White House. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, urged other senators to vote against the nomination in a statement Wednesday.
"Mr. Menashi should not be rewarded for providing such bad legal advice with a lifetime appointment to the federal bench," Feinstein said.
The Senate Judiciary Committee narrowly advanced his nomination along party lines last week.
Menashi faced criticism over his writings going as far back as college, including a 2010 law review piece critical of "ethnically heterogeneous societies."
And one day before he was voted out of committee, The New York Times reported that Menashi wrote a legal memo while he was acting general counsel for the Department of Education that laid out how Social Security data could be used to block students from obtaining debt relief. A federal judge struck down the plan.
Menashi also drew bipartisan frustrations during his nomination hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee in September. A current attorney in the White House counsel's office, Menashi repeatedly declined to reveal even the topics that he offered legal advice on for the White House, citing executive privilege.
After prodding by Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, Menashi did acknowledge that he sometimes gave advice on topics like immigration. But the lack of candor during the questioning raised eyebrows from those on both sides of the aisle, including GOP Sen. John Kennedy. Kennedy ultimately voted to advance Menashi out of committee.
Democrats also raised concerns about whether Menashi was involved in an alleged cover-up by White House lawyers of Trump's July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The call is at the heart of the House's impeachment inquiry, as Trump asked Zelensky to investigate his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden and Biden's son, Hunter.
Collins, who voted against the nominee, had said in October that she wouldn't support Menashi. She said his "past writings, particularly about women, LGBTQ advocates and diversity, raise questions about whether he has the appropriate judicial temperament."
Trump announced in August that Menashi would be his nominee for a seat on the Second Circuit. A former Kirkland & Ellis partner, Menashi previously clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250