Major Lindsey Settles Suit Against Rival Recruiter MLegal and Former Partner
Major Lindsey sued rival MLegal in Washington's federal trial court, alleging a former partner's move had violated provisions of a noncompete.
November 22, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
The national attorney recruitment firm Major, Lindsey & Africa on Friday said it was dropping a lawsuit alleging a former partner who jumped to rival MLegal Group violated the terms of a noncompete provision in her employment agreement.
Lawyers for MLegal and the former Major Lindsey partner, Lauren Drake, indicated earlier this month the parties reached a settlement that would take effect Friday. Major Lindsey's lawyers at the management-side firm Littler Mendelson filed papers Friday afternoon dismissing the case with prejudice. A hearing had been scheduled for early December.
A representative from Major Lindsey said in a statement that "the parties reached a mutually acceptable resolution." Lawyers for Drake and MLegal, represented by a team from Washington's Fortney Scott, were not immediately reached for comment.
The case was poised to open a window to workplace culture at Major Lindsey. Drake claimed a "hostile, male-dominated work environment" contributed to her decision to leave. Major Lindsey disputed Drake's assertions.
Major Lindsey sued MLegal and Drake in Washington's federal trial court in late October. The complaint alleged Drake's employment at MLegal, an upstart firm in the Washington legal market, violated a noncompete clause. Drake had been a Major Lindsey employee for five years and a partner since July. She left the firm in late September.
California-based MLegal, pressing into Washington, has poached other Major Lindsey recruiters, including Jane Sullivan Roberts, whose husband is the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Major Lindsey's suit accused MLegal of "looking to staff its D.C. office with trained recruiters, including Drake, for purposes of gaining a fast-track competitive advantage in the market without having to undertake the investment of time and resources otherwise required."
Drake's lawyers, in letters to Littler Mendelson, disputed that Drake was violating geographic and other restrictions on her post-Major Lindsey employment.
The feud between the rival recruiters was particularly acrimonious because Drake's lawyers alleged office culture—involving alleged inappropriate behavior by unidentified male employees at Major Lindsey—contributed to her decision to go work for MLegal.
"Despite outward appearances, the venerable legal recruitment firm has largely become a far less professional boys' club, leaving a number of its employees and, in particular, many of its stalwart older female employees feeling dismayed, disenfranchised and increasingly uncomfortable in their work environment," Leslie Silverman of Fortney Scott said in a letter to Major Lindsey's lawyers that was included in court filings.
Major Lindsey's general counsel, Maureen Dry-Wasson, said in an earlier statement that the Major Lindsey first heard any complaint from Drake at the time the firm asked her to honor her noncompete agreement.
"We have a zero tolerance policy and would have investigated any report," Dry-Wasson said in the statement. "As a matter of fairness to all the people who work here, I'm disappointed by the use of this tactic in a matter that is very straightforward."
Littler shareholder Paul Kennedy said in one letter to Drake's lawyers that Major Lindsey "offers a diverse work environment, with multiple females in key leadership positions." Kennedy said the firm "embraces the #MeToo Movement, and is prepared to investigate further the multiple generic allegations you raise."
Read more:
Ex-Major Lindsey Partner, Sued Over Noncompete, Asserts Misconduct Claims
Jane Sullivan Roberts, Wife of Chief Justice, Opens DC Outpost for Recruiter MLegal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
High Court Rejects 'Heightened' Standard for Employers Defending FLSA Cases
Supreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250