US Justice Dept. Secrecy in McCabe Records Suit Is Challenged
"[T]here is virtually no likelihood that any legitimate interest of the government will be harmed by disclosing the contents of the ex parte discussions," Anne Weismann, chief FOIA counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said in a court filing Tuesday.
November 26, 2019 at 03:26 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge on Tuesday was pressed to publicly reveal secret communications between the U.S. Justice Department and the court that could shed light on the Trump administration's controversial move to fire and criminally investigate former FBI acting director Andrew McCabe.
The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington asked U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton to unseal three sets of transcripts in which government lawyers spoke alone with Walton outside the presence of other lawyers. Those transcripts could shed light on the status of the probe, along with any problems prosecutors faced, in a drawn-out investigation Walton has criticized for leaving McCabe in "limbo."
Walton is presiding over a public records request that confronts the firing and criminal investigation of McCabe, an embattled career FBI official who assumed the leadership of the bureau after Trump fired James Comey in 2017.
McCabe has for months faced a criminal investigation concerning whether he lied to federal agents examining the FBI's dealings with the news media. In a report last year, released a month before McCabe's firing, the Justice Department's inspector general said the former deputy FBI director lacked candor during an internal probe into the disclosure of information to a Wall Street Journal reporter for an October 2016 article on an investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
McCabe was fired in March 2018, just days before he was set to retire with full benefits. He has since sued the Justice Department over his termination, alleging that it was part of a scheme by the Trump administration to discredit and remove law enforcement officials who would not pledge loyalty to the president. McCabe has disputed the report's findings.
Newly unsealed documents in a Freedom of Information Act case, filed Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, or CREW, confirmed the Justice Department had opened a criminal investigation. But the status of the investigation is unclear. McCabe had earlier previously acknowledged the criminal investigation.
In September, McCabe's defense lawyers—including David Schertler of Washington's Schertler & Onorato and Michael Bromwich of Steptoe & Johnson LLP—asked federal prosecutors in Washington whether a grand jury had declined to indict the former FBI leader. The inquiry came in response to news reports that a grand jury had met to consider charges against McCabe without issuing an indictment.
The Justice Department this month backed off its claims that records in the FOIA lawsuit could not be turned over to CREW because they related to an ongoing law enforcement investigation. For months, the Justice Department had argued certain records should be withheld on those grounds, and its sudden reversal prompted Walton to question whether he had been "manipulated" into stalling the release of information to the public.
Walton ordered the unsealing of a declaration made by Stephen Lyons, a special agent in the Justice Department inspector general's office, which the government provided earlier this year to justify the continued withholding of records. Lyons said in his declaration that the release of particular records, without redactions, would potentially interfere with the ongoing investigation and risk jeopardizing any criminal proceedings that could arise out of the probe.
Anne Weismann, chief public records counsel at CREW, argued Tuesday that Walton should unseal the transcripts of closed-door communications in which government lawyers explained why the release of records would interfere with an ongoing law enforcement proceeding. The government intends to oppose the request, at least in part, that the court release three now-sealed transcripts.
"[T]here is virtually no likelihood that any legitimate interest of the government will be harmed by disclosing the contents of the ex parte discussions, which pertain to the contents of the Lyons declaration," Weismann wrote in Tuesday's filing. "Quite simply there is no government interest in secrecy to weigh against the significant public interest in disclosure."
Walton has voiced frustration with prosecutors through the public records case. At a recent hearing, Walton suggested prosecutors should not have a hard time weighing any criminal case against McCabe.
"Maybe politically, but not factually or legally," he said.
Read more:
Judge Questions Whether DOJ 'Manipulated' Him in McCabe FOIA Suit
Ousted FBI Leader McCabe Sues Justice Dept. for Alleged Retaliation
Steptoe Adds White-Collar Vet Michael Bromwich
Fired FBI Agent Peter Strzok, 'Demonized' by Trump, Sues For Reinstatement
Robert Mueller Got Animated Just Once: Defending His Prosecutors
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250