'An Existential Threat': House Report Berates Pat Cipollone's Legal Claims on Impeachment Inquiry
"If allowed to stand, the President's defiance, as justified by Mr. Cipollone, would represent an existential threat to the nation's Constitutional system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and rule of law," the House Intelligence Committee report reads.
December 03, 2019 at 06:52 PM
5 minute read
The U.S. House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry report is taking direct aim at White House counsel Pat Cipollone's legal claims behind the president's refusal to participate in the impeachment proceedings, warning they could do lasting damage to Congress' ability to investigate potential abuses of power.
In the report, released Tuesday, congressional investigators said the letter "advanced remarkably politicized arguments and legal theories unsupported by the Constitution, judicial precedent, and more than 200 years of history."
"If allowed to stand, the President's defiance, as justified by Mr. Cipollone, would represent an existential threat to the nation's Constitutional system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and rule of law," the report reads.
The White House counsel's letter, as noted in the report, was met with widespread and bipartisan criticism in the legal community.
That criticism only deepened with the release of Tuesday's report, which characterized Trump's stonewalling as being a dire threat to the House's impeachment powers.
"If left unanswered, President Trump's ongoing effort to thwart Congress' impeachment power risks doing grave harm to the institution of Congress, the balance of power between our branches of government, and the Constitutional order that the President and every Member of Congress have sworn to protect and defend," the document reads.
The authors offered a nearly point-by-point rebuttal of Cipollone's legal claims. For example, the report takes on the White House attorney's assertion that "it is unconstitutional to exclude agency counsel from participating in congressional depositions."
"Mr. Cipollone cites no case law to support his position—because there is none," the report states. "Instead, he relies on a single opinion from the Trump Administration's Office of Legal Counsel and ignores the ample legal authority and historical precedent that clearly support the Committees' actions."
And in response to Cipollone's claims that Trump's top advisers are "absolutely immune" from having to testify before Congress, the House report points to court rulings striking down the concept.
"In ordering categorical defiance of House subpoenas, President Trump has confirmed the unlimited breadth of his position and his unprecedented view that no branch of government—even the House—is empowered to investigate whether he may have committed constitutional offenses," the report reads.
Cipollone has played a prominent role in defending the president in the course of the inquiry. He has been in touch with Republican senators ahead of an anticipated Senate trial early next year, and has been the attorney responding to the House's efforts, rather than any of Trump's private lawyers.
And Cipollone, a former partner at Kirkland & Ellis and Stein, Mitchell, Cipollone, Beato & Missner, on Sunday again called the inquiry "baseless and highly partisan" in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler.
In that letter, Cipollone said the White House won't participate in the Judiciary Committee's first impeachment hearing Wednesday, but left the door open to it engaging in future proceedings.
The second half of Tuesday's report focuses on Trump's efforts to obstruct the impeachment inquiry, largely by refusing to provide documents or allow top administration officials to testify as part of the probe.
It lists each witness who was called to testify and then defied the subpoena at the direction of the administration. Some of those witnesses pointed to Cipollone's letter as a reason not to comply with the subpoena.
But, as the report notes, several witnesses still complied with subpoenas and testified both at closed-door depositions and public hearings.
"These officials not only served their nation honorably, but they fulfilled their oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States," the report reads.
The report also points to ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation for documents related to the Ukraine investigation. It specifically cited documents obtained by the watchdog group American Oversight last month, which included emails between Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and State Department officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in relation to Ukraine.
"This handful of documents was limited to a narrow window of time and specific people, but it clearly indicates that the Department is withholding documents that are responsive to the Committees' requests," the report reads.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readPresidential Immunity Doesn't Block Trump's NY Criminal Prosecution, Judge Rules
DC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readJustices to Decide if Fuel Industry Can Sue Over California’s EV Rules
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250