'An Existential Threat': House Report Berates Pat Cipollone's Legal Claims on Impeachment Inquiry
"If allowed to stand, the President's defiance, as justified by Mr. Cipollone, would represent an existential threat to the nation's Constitutional system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and rule of law," the House Intelligence Committee report reads.
December 03, 2019 at 06:52 PM
5 minute read
The U.S. House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry report is taking direct aim at White House counsel Pat Cipollone's legal claims behind the president's refusal to participate in the impeachment proceedings, warning they could do lasting damage to Congress' ability to investigate potential abuses of power.
In the report, released Tuesday, congressional investigators said the letter "advanced remarkably politicized arguments and legal theories unsupported by the Constitution, judicial precedent, and more than 200 years of history."
"If allowed to stand, the President's defiance, as justified by Mr. Cipollone, would represent an existential threat to the nation's Constitutional system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and rule of law," the report reads.
The White House counsel's letter, as noted in the report, was met with widespread and bipartisan criticism in the legal community.
That criticism only deepened with the release of Tuesday's report, which characterized Trump's stonewalling as being a dire threat to the House's impeachment powers.
"If left unanswered, President Trump's ongoing effort to thwart Congress' impeachment power risks doing grave harm to the institution of Congress, the balance of power between our branches of government, and the Constitutional order that the President and every Member of Congress have sworn to protect and defend," the document reads.
The authors offered a nearly point-by-point rebuttal of Cipollone's legal claims. For example, the report takes on the White House attorney's assertion that "it is unconstitutional to exclude agency counsel from participating in congressional depositions."
"Mr. Cipollone cites no case law to support his position—because there is none," the report states. "Instead, he relies on a single opinion from the Trump Administration's Office of Legal Counsel and ignores the ample legal authority and historical precedent that clearly support the Committees' actions."
And in response to Cipollone's claims that Trump's top advisers are "absolutely immune" from having to testify before Congress, the House report points to court rulings striking down the concept.
"In ordering categorical defiance of House subpoenas, President Trump has confirmed the unlimited breadth of his position and his unprecedented view that no branch of government—even the House—is empowered to investigate whether he may have committed constitutional offenses," the report reads.
Cipollone has played a prominent role in defending the president in the course of the inquiry. He has been in touch with Republican senators ahead of an anticipated Senate trial early next year, and has been the attorney responding to the House's efforts, rather than any of Trump's private lawyers.
And Cipollone, a former partner at Kirkland & Ellis and Stein, Mitchell, Cipollone, Beato & Missner, on Sunday again called the inquiry "baseless and highly partisan" in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler.
In that letter, Cipollone said the White House won't participate in the Judiciary Committee's first impeachment hearing Wednesday, but left the door open to it engaging in future proceedings.
The second half of Tuesday's report focuses on Trump's efforts to obstruct the impeachment inquiry, largely by refusing to provide documents or allow top administration officials to testify as part of the probe.
It lists each witness who was called to testify and then defied the subpoena at the direction of the administration. Some of those witnesses pointed to Cipollone's letter as a reason not to comply with the subpoena.
But, as the report notes, several witnesses still complied with subpoenas and testified both at closed-door depositions and public hearings.
"These officials not only served their nation honorably, but they fulfilled their oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States," the report reads.
The report also points to ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation for documents related to the Ukraine investigation. It specifically cited documents obtained by the watchdog group American Oversight last month, which included emails between Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and State Department officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in relation to Ukraine.
"This handful of documents was limited to a narrow window of time and specific people, but it clearly indicates that the Department is withholding documents that are responsive to the Committees' requests," the report reads.
Read more:
Meet the Constitutional Law Scholars Who Will Help the House Figure Out Impeachment
As White House Stonewalls on Ukraine Docs, Wave of FOIA Suits Seek to Pry Them Loose
2nd Circuit Rejects Trump Bid to Block House Subpoenas for Financial Records
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250