NY Judge Disqualifies Sidley's James Cole From Defending Huawei
The ruling, under seal in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, came almost six months after federal prosecutors argued that an "obvious conflict of interest" should prevent the Sidley Austin partner from representing Huawei.
December 03, 2019 at 05:53 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge on Tuesday barred James Cole, a former deputy U.S. attorney general, from continuing to defend the Chinese telecom Huawei, siding with federal prosecutors who argued the Sidley Austin partner should be disqualified based on his role in an unspecified investigation during his tenure at the Justice Department.
U.S. District Judge Ann M. Donnelly's decision to disqualify Cole came almost six months after federal prosecutors in Brooklyn argued that an "obvious conflict of interest" should prevent him from representing Huawei, which is facing charges it violated sanctions against Iran.
Donnelly did not immediately make her decision public, instead submitting it to a "classified information security officer" for a review. The judge said the decision would be made public— with redactions—by Jan. 10 and directed Sidley Austin to take "prompt and reasonable steps to address all issues arising from Mr. Cole's conflict."
Cole, who served from 2011 to 2015 as the second-ranking Justice Department official, was not immediately reached for comment about the ruling. Huawei continues to be represented in the case by Jenner & Block partner David Bitkower and Sidley Austin partner Michael Levy.
In extensively redacted papers, federal prosecutors did not publicly specify the past investigation that purportedly presented a conflict of interest, but they raised concerns that Cole could use information from the probe to help Huawei. Prosecutors said the court could have "no confidence that Cole will not use, whether intentionally or not, information" from that investigation.
Describing the U.S. government as Cole's "former client," prosecutors said ethics rules "protect a former client against such conduct by a former attorney."
Cole entered an appearance in Huawei's case in March, months after the company and its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, were indicted on a raft of charges, including bank fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering, in what prosecutors described as a scheme to circumvent U.S. sanctions against Iran.
In their redacted court papers, prosecutors said Cole co-signed a letter in January 2019 to then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which he stated he was representing Huawei. Later that month, following Wanzhou's arrest in Canada, Justice Department and FBI officials informed Cole that they believed he had a conflict of interest in the case, prosecutors said.
Cole and Huawei had contested the Justice Department's bid to disqualify him from the case, denying that his former Justice Department role created a conflict of interest. In September, Donnelly asked prosecutors to make a nonpublic filing to help her determine whether to disqualify Cole.
Huawei has turned to a stable of major U.S. law firms as it has come under increased scrutiny, hiring lobbyists from Sidley, Jones Day, Steptoe & Johnson LLP and Squire Patton Boggs.
A Sidley team that included Thomas Green, the defense lawyer for former Trump aide Rick Gates, and Mark Hopson, the managing partner of the firm's Washington office, registered in August to lobby for Huawei on "export controls, trade and economic sanctions, and other national security-related topics."
Huawei hired Jones Day and another firm with ties to the Trump administration—Morgan, Lewis & Bockius—to challenge a law funding the Department of Defense that prevents the U.S. government from purchasing the Chinese company's products. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 2For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 3As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 4General Warrants and ESI
- 5GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250