Hundreds of Law Profs Declare Trump's Conduct 'Clearly Impeachable'
"There is overwhelming evidence that President Trump betrayed his oath of office," the professors said in an open letter sponsored by the government watchdog Protect Democracy.
December 06, 2019 at 01:36 PM
4 minute read
Hundreds of law professors from schools across the country published an open letter Friday declaring President Donald Trump's conduct involving Ukraine as "clearly impeachable," an assertion that comes after a daylong hearing earlier this week at which Republicans and Democrats sharply divided over their assessment of the president's actions.
The letter, posted on the website Medium and sponsored by the government watchdog Protect Democracy, had been signed by 520 professors as of Friday afternoon. The assertions were an attempt to frame the debate as one of law, and not partisan politics.
"There is overwhelming evidence that President Trump betrayed his oath of office by seeking to use presidential power to pressure a foreign government to help him distort an American election, for his personal and political benefit, at the direct expense of national security interests as determined by Congress," the professors said in the letter. "His conduct is precisely the type of threat to our democracy that the founders feared when they included the remedy of impeachment in the Constitution."
Professors signed the letter from a variety of law schools across the country, including Columbia Law; Yale; Stanford; Harvard; Duke; Emory University; Georgetown Law; Berkeley Law; University of Florida; University of Pennsylvania; Albany Law; University of Texas; Rutgers; and the University of Georgia.
The House impeachment investigation focuses on claims Trump abused the power of the presidency to pressure Ukraine to meddle in U.S. politics to the president's benefit. The Trump administration withheld nearly $400 million in military aid from Ukraine as the president asked for a "favor" from the country to investigate Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
Trump has denied he put any untoward or unlawful pressure on Ukraine to meddle in U.S. political affairs. Trump's allies have argued he was concerned about corruption in Ukraine, and that military aide to the U.S. ally was delivered, in the end, without any promise from Ukrainian leaders to investigate the Bidens. Many Republicans have raised questions that point to Ukraine, and not Russia, as having orchestrated the 2016 presidential election interference campaign.
At last Wednesday's impeachment hearing in the House Judiciary Committee, the Republican-named witness, Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University School of Law, said a proven quid pro quo involving Trump and Ukraine could be impeachable. But he alleged the evidence is not there to make such a conclusion.
"This is a process that must focus on impeachable conduct, not imprudent or even obnoxious conduct," Turley said in his prepared testimony.
The letter-signers did not take a position on whether Trump should be impeached and removed for his conduct, saying ultimately that's a question for House and Senate members.
"If the House of Representatives impeached the President for the conduct described here and the Senate voted to remove him, they would be acting well within their constitutional powers," the professors wrote. "Whether President Trump's conduct is classified as bribery, as a high crime or misdemeanor, or as both, it is clearly impeachable under our Constitution."
House Democrats are drafting articles of impeachment, and scheduled a hearing for Monday at which counsels for the House intelligence and judiciary committees will present evidence purporting to support impeaching Trump. White House Counsel Pat Cipollone faces a 5 p.m. deadline today to say whether and how the president might participate in House proceedings.
Read more:
Constitutional Law Scholars Face Off Over Donald Trump's Impeachment
Wave of FOIA Suits Confront Trump Stonewalling on Ukraine Papers
House Impeachment Lawyers Duel as Witness Testimony Goes Public
16 Conservative Lawyers Say They Support 'Expeditious' Impeachment Inquiry
'Barely-Lawyered Temper Tantrum': Lawyers Slam Cipollone's Impeachment Letter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSeveral Big Law Firms Saw Year-Over-Year Lobbying Revenue Growth in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 2'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 3Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 4Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
- 5Davis Wright Tremaine Turns to Gen AI To Teach Its Associates Legal Writing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250