Judge Hints He Might Rule for Jones Day on Some Claims in Gender Discrimination Suit
"I could probably go back to my chambers and figure it out in 15 minutes," U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said of one of the arguments Monday.
December 16, 2019 at 03:11 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge on Monday hinted that he may dismiss at least some of the claims brought against Jones Day in a proposed $200 million class action lawsuit over alleged gender discrimination.
Jones Day lawyer Jacob Roth said during a hearing Monday that the former female lawyers at the firm behind the claims—represented by attorneys at Sanford Heisler Sharp—had merely made the assertions without providing much, if any, evidence to back them up. The hearing was over a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings, filed by Jones Day in July.
For example, Roth argued that Moss should dismiss allegations that male associates are disproportionately promoted compared to female associates. Roth said information on promotions is made publicly available by Jones Day and that Sanford Heisler lawyers could have run those numbers and included them in the complaint.
Judge Randolph Moss of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seemed to side with Roth's argument. "I could probably go back to my chambers and figure it out in 15 minutes," the judge said.
Sanford Heisler attorney Deborah Marcuse said that more information was needed to make such a comparison, like which year each of the promoted attorneys started in the firm, and how many women from that class were made partner compared to men.
But Moss remained doubtful, saying the claim of discriminatory promotions depends on each class of associates that are made partner, and isn't necessarily dependent on the rest of the lawyers in that starting class.
Marcuse generally urged Moss to view the allegations from a broader lens, saying the claims, taken together, paint a picture of a firm that doesn't compensate female associates the same as it does male associates for equal work.
On other claims, Moss seemed less sure that he should throw them out. He noted that at this stage of the litigation, he is required to rule in a more favorable light for the plaintiffs.
And he pointed out that Jones Day has exclusive control over a great deal of the data that the plaintiffs are seeking, meaning the Sanford Heisler lawyers are at an inherent disadvantage.
Moss also said some of the claims made against the firm, like an alleged policy of employees not sharing compensation information, would make it more difficult for the Sanford Heisler lawyers to get that compensation data from outside sources, like associates who have left the firm.
The hearing was held days after Jones Day filed for sanctions against the Sanford Heisler attorneys, arguing its lawyers failed to research whether the firm actually pays male associates more than female associates.
"Plaintiffs' pay discrimination claims are based on the misconceived and legally baseless notion that all lawyers in all geographic markets have, at all times over the past decade, been entitled to so-called 'Cravath scale' regardless of the quality of their performance or their productivity," the Jones Day lawyers wrote in the filing, made earlier this month.
That matter is currently being briefed and did not come up during Monday's hearing.
Correction: This post has been updated to accurately reflect Moss's comments about how he should rule regarding the plaintiffs, not the defendants, in this case.
Read more:
Jones Day Wants Sanctions in Gender Bias Case, Says Lawyers Bungled 'Cravath Scale' Claims
Collective Action Bid Ups the Ante in Jones Day Associates' Gender Bias Case
Jones Day Remains Locked in Court Battle With Plaintiffs Suing Firm Over Bias Claims
Jones Day Attacks 'Warped Portrayal' in $200M Gender Bias Class Action
Jones Day Bias Claims Spread to Atlanta, New York as More Accusers Go Public
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn-House Moves of the Month: Boeing Loses Another Lawyer, HubSpot Legal Chief Out After 2 Years
5 minute readAfter Regime Change, Syria Remains Liable in US Federal Courts for Alleged Assad-Era Terrorism Support
3 minute readSplit 4th Circuit Ruling Is a Win for Covington & Burling in US Army Base Attack Litigation
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250