'Danger to Due Process': Frequent Kozinski Foe Calls for Ex-Judge's Disbarment in Lawsuit
Attorney Cyrus Sanai filed complaints against Alex Kozinski more than a decade ago over the former Ninth Circuit chief judge's public server which contained pornographic material. Now, Sanai says he's suing to clear his own name and reform judicial misconduct procedures in the process.
December 17, 2019 at 12:16 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
An attorney who filed a complaint over Alex Kozinski's personal web server containing pornography more than a decade ago has sued the former circuit judge over claims the judge encouraged the court to retaliate against him.
Cyrus Sanai, who is representing himself in suing the former chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, told The Recorder the suit is less about the $40 million he is seeking and more about clearing his name and reforming judicial misconduct procedures. Kozinski retired two years ago, heading off an investigation into claims of sexual misconduct lodged by several of his former clerks.
In Sanai's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Monday, the Beverly Hills lawyer claims the judiciary knew about Kozinski's pattern of harassment back in 2009 when the Third Circuit Judicial Council investigated Kozinski's publicly accessible server which contained porn. Sanai's lawsuit claims Kozinski's colleagues on the bench helped bury the issue.
Sanai alleges that Kozinski committed perjury when he denied ever showing the sexually explicit photos and videos on the server to anyone in his official capacity as a judge. That would make Kozinski vulnerable to losing his law license.
Six years after the Third Circuit investigation, more than a dozen women came forward with sexual harassment allegations against Kozinski, some claiming he forced them to view pornographic images.
Kozinski did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Monday afternoon.
Sanai is asking for injunctive relief for alleged violation of his constitutional rights over claims the Ninth Circuit retaliated against him for filing a complaint about Kozinski's server. The Judicial Council issued a censure order against Sanai in 2010, and he claims the Council tried to disbar him in California.
Sanai was censured for filing a possibly frivolous misconduct complaint, according to the September 2010 order.
In addition to Kozinski, the suit names a handful of judges who Sanai alleges participated in retaliation against him, including Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Sidney Thomas, and Circuit Judges M. Margaret McKeown, Ronald Gould and Johnnie Rawlinson. A spokesperson for the court didn't respond to messages Monday evening.
Besides violation of constitutional rights, Sanai is bringing eight other causes of action in the suit including abuse of process; malicious prosecution; and wrongful use of administrative proceedings.
"Kozinski needs to be removed as a lawyer," Sanai said. "He's a danger to due process."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCSX Joins Rest of Big Four Railroad Companies in Installing New Generation of Legal Leadership
Trending Stories
- 1Partner Compensation, Billing Rates Are Trending Higher in Dallas Than Houston
- 2Pa. Firms Carve Out Niche in Guiding Lawyers, Funders on Litigation Finance
- 3New York’s Equal Rights Amendment Is a Big Deal
- 4Blue-Ribbon Panel Calls for Pay Bumps for NYS Commissioners, But Says No to Lawmakers, Elected Officials
- 5'Outstanding Cooperation': Feds Seek Leniency in Sentencing for Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250