Chief Justice Roberts: Judges Are a Check Against 'False Information'
"The public's need to understand our government, and the protections it provides, is ever more vital," Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said in his annual year-end report on the federal judiciary.
December 31, 2019 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
A "strong and independent" judiciary plays a central role in civic education and in promoting "national unity and stability," Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. asserted in an annual year-end report that arrives as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to confront the secrecy of President Donald Trump's tax returns and as Roberts is expected soon to preside over the president's impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate.
"In our age, when social media can instantly spread rumor and false information on a grand scale, the public's need to understand our government, and the protections it provides, is ever more vital," Roberts said in his report. He urged federal judges "to continue their efforts to promote public confidence in the judiciary, both through their rulings and through civic outreach."
The courts, Roberts said, should be celebrated as a "key source" of national unity. "But we should also remember that justice is not inevitable. We should reflect on our duty to judge without fear or favor, deciding each matter with humility, integrity, and dispatch," the chief justice wrote. He continued: "We should each resolve to do our best to maintain the public's trust that we are faithfully discharging our solemn obligation to equal justice under law."
Trump has often lambasted the courts, impugning judges whose rulings have delivered setbacks to the administration, including efforts to impede immigration. Federal judges have largely not tangled publicly with Trump outside of their written opinions. It was only a little more than a year ago when Roberts, in a rare public statement, pushed back against Trump's diatribes about the courts.
"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in November 2018. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."
Roberts's year-end statement comes just weeks before the Supreme Court is set to hear two cases that carry perhaps the most personal significance to Trump.
The cases concern the power of state prosecutors and congressional investigators to obtain Trump-related financial information from his accounting firm and two banks. Judges in New York and in the District of Columbia have upheld subpoenas for those documents, and the cases will present the Roberts court with its first chance to assess the president's contention that his personal financial records must remain out of reach.
More immediately, as early as next week, Roberts will be in the national spotlight during Trump's impeachment trial, compelled to preside over the proceedings not by his choosing but by the mandate of the U.S. Constitution. The House, led by Democrats and a largely party-line vote, impeached Trump on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.
For several weeks now, lawyers and legal scholars have debated whether and how Roberts will play a substantive role—making any decisions, for instance, to allow witness testimony—or largely serve as a ceremonial leader.
"The country should be less concerned about anything the chief justice is likely to do and more concerned about how fairly his decisions will be portrayed by commentators eager to wring political significance from his every word and action," Williams & Connolly associate Jane Chong, who clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, wrote earlier this month in a piece at The Atlantic.
|
Read Chief Justice John Roberts's year-end report:
Roberts praised various efforts the courts have undertaken to promote civic education in an era, the chief justice said, where "we have come to take democracy for granted." Roberts touted the availability of opinions online, and he said "judges from coast to coast have made their courthouses available as forums for civic education." He also praised the civic engagement program iCivics that retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor helped establish.
Chief Justice Earl Warren's 1954 unanimous ruling in Brown v. Board of Education "illustrated the power of a judicial decision as a teaching tool," Roberts said.
The Brown decision, at 11 pages, was "short enough that newspapers could publish all or almost all of it and every citizen could understand the court's rationale." Roberts described Brown v. Board of Education as "the great school desegregation case." Many of Trump's nominees for the federal courts faced criticism for initially refusing to state whether the case was correctly decided.
While applauding the extensive civic outreach efforts undertaken by federal appeals courts and district courts, Roberts mentioned only a few programs involving the Supreme Court itself, including partnering with other branches of government and running a 40-year-old unpaid internship program. By contrast, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom offers a range of educational activities and resources for students.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
6 minute readPolicy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250