Gender Diversity Declines at US Solicitor General's Office
Last term, of the 185 appearances made by lawyers before the Supreme Court, only 32 were women, and of them, only 10 were in private practice.
January 07, 2020 at 03:29 PM
5 minute read
The recent departure from the U.S. solicitor general's office of several female lawyers—most recently Elizabeth Prelogar—has left only four women out of 16 assistant positions in the office.
With the U.S. Supreme Court bar dominated by men, the solicitor general's office has long played an important role as a source of talented female attorneys. Lawyers including Lisa Blatt, Deanne Maynard, Beth Brinkmann, Ilana Eisenstein, Elaine Goldenberg, Nicole Saharsky and now Prelogar have gone on to become Supreme Court practitioners and appellate practice leaders at major law firms.
Last term, of the 185 appearances made by lawyers before the Supreme Court, only 32 were women, and of them, only 10 were in private practice. The rest were from the solicitor general's office or from state or local agencies.
"The gender imbalance in the Supreme Court bar is skewed to say the least," said Sarah Harrington, a veteran of the office who joined Goldstein & Russell in 2017. "If the OSG ranks are almost exclusively male, that will inevitably exacerbate the gender imbalance for years to come." During her time in the office, Harrington said eight of the 16 assistants were female. All of the eight have left, she said.
The four women currently serving as assistants to the solicitor general are Erica Ross, Morgan Ratner, Colleen Sinzdak and Rebecca Taibleson.
Taibleson is the latest hire, joining the office in December and detailed from her position as an assistant U.S. attorney at the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
A former law clerk to then-judge Brett Kavanaugh and Justice Antonin Scalia, Taibleson testified in favor of Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination in September 2018. She extolled Kavanaugh's "humility, collegiality, and kindness," and asserted he "cannot be pressured by his law clerks or colleagues, and he cannot be intimidated by other actors in government."
Sinzdak, a former Hogan Lovells lawyer who clerked for D.C. Circuit judge Merrick Garland and chief justice John Roberts Jr., also testified in support of Kavanaugh, one of her professors at Harvard Law School. She said the judiciary and the nation "suffered greatly" from the Senate's failure to confirm Garland for the Supreme Court, but said "Kavanaugh has the traits that make him eminently qualified to serve as a justice on the United States Supreme Court." She joined the solicitor's office last September.
Morgan Ratner, formerly a Hogan Lovells associate, clerked for Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts before she joined the solicitor general's office in 2017. Erica Ross, formerly a lawyer at Jenner & Block, clerked for D.C. Circuit Judge David Tatel and Justice Elena Kagan, and came to the solicitor's office in 2017.
Other female assistants to the solicitor general who've recently left included Rachel Kovner, confirmed in October to a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Kovner, who clerked for Scalia in the 2007-2008 term, had argued 11 cases at the Supreme Court since 2013.
"If there are a lot of women in that office, then a lot of women argue," Goldenberg, now at Munger Tolles, told Bloomberg Law last year. "If there aren't a lot of women in that office, then not a lot of women argue."
In spite of the low numbers, sources familiar with the office said principal deputy solicitor general Jeffrey Wall has tried to recruit women.
At a panel discussion last October about the dearth of female advocates before the court, Williams & Connolly partner Sarah Harris said of Wall, "I think the SG's office has been quite conscious of where they are in hiring women, and I have seen very few people work as hard as he has in trying to find good women out there."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250