SCOTUS Conference Watch: Big Petitions Set for Justices' Review
Friday is the first conference for the justices in the new year. Here's a look at some of the major petitions awaiting action.
January 09, 2020 at 02:35 PM
6 minute read
A state assault weapons ban, grand jury secrecy, health care, religious job discrimination and immigrant sanctuary laws are among the issues and cases facing the U.S. Supreme Court justices during their private conference Friday, the first of the new year.
The justices are arriving soon at that point of no return, where the high court typically stops adding cases to the term's argument docket. Of course, the court can do what the court wants, adding cases when it so chooses. Will we see a special sitting in May in the Obamacare case that's arrived from the Fifth Circuit?
In the meantime, here are some of the petitions the justices are scheduled to review Friday at their private conference:
|Second Amendment
>> Worman v. Healey: The case challenges the Massachusetts assault weapons ban. John Parker Sweeney, a Bradley Arant Boult Cummings partner in Washington, is lead counsel for the challengers, who include firearms owners, dealers and an advocacy organization. Julia Kobick of the Massachusetts attorney general's office is counsel of record for the state.
|
Alien Tort Statute
>> Nestlé v. Doe: This case examines the contours of claims arising under the Alien Tort Statute. Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal represents Nestlé. A team from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, including Theodore Boutrous Jr., was also on the petition. Paul Hoffman of Schonbrun Seplow Harris & Hoffman represents the respondents. Mayer Brown partner Andrew Pincus represents Cargill in a separate Alien Tort Statute case.
|LGBT
>> Arlene Flowers v. Washington: The case, following Masterpiece Cake, looks at religious objections to making floral arrangement for a gay wedding. Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom is counsel of record for the petitioner. Washington state solicitor Noah Purcell represents the state.
>> Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: The case asks whether religious child welfare agencies with government contracts may refuse to provide services to same-sex couples. Mark Rienzi of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty is counsel of record for the petitioners. Philadelphia hired Deepak Gupta of Washington's Gupta Wessler.
|
Secrecy
>> McKeever v. Barr: This case confronts the power of trial judges to release on their own historically significant grand jury materials. Latham & Watkins partner Roman Martinez represents McKeever.
>> Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra: This case addresses California's push to require disclosure of individual identities and addresses of major donors to private nonprofit organizations. Derek Shaffer of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan is counsel to Americans for Prosperity.
|Immigration
>> United States v. California: This case is the Justice Department's challenge to California's immigration laws. Aimee Feinberg, deputy California solicitor general, is counsel to California.
|Excessive fines
>> Colorado Dept. of Labor and Employment v. Dami Hospitality: The case questions whether the Eighth Amendment's excessive fines clause applies to corporations as it does to individuals. Both sides urged the court to grant the case. Colorado's solicitor, Eric Olson, is counsel for the state. Latham & Watkins partner Gregory Garre is counsel for Dami Hospitality.
|Affordable Care Act
>> Trump v. Pennsylvania: A new Affordable Care Act case that looks at "whether the agencies had statutory authority under the ACA and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to expand the conscience exemption to the contraceptive-coverage mandate." Michael Fischer, chief deputy attorney general, is counsel to Pennsylvania.
|Jurisdiction
>> Ford Motor v. Bandemer/Ford Motor v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court: Ford Motor Co. asks what connection is required between a plaintiff's claims and a nonresident defendant's forum contacts for a court to exercise personal jurisdiction. Hogan Lovells partner Sean Marotta is counsel to Ford. Kyle Farrar of Kaster, Lynch, Farrar & Ball represents Bandemer. Gupta Wessler's Deepak Gupta is counsel to Charles Lucero.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250