Surveillance Court Picks Ex-DOJ Leader David Kris to Review FBI Reforms
"The FBI is committed to working with the court and DOJ to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the FISA process," FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in a declaration Friday.
January 10, 2020 at 07:32 PM
5 minute read
A secretive federal court in Washington on Friday appointed David Kris, a former Obama-era national security leader at the Justice Department, to review changes the FBI has proposed to its surveillance application process in the aftermath of an inspector general report that exposed misconduct in the bureau's handling of applications related to the monitoring of a Trump campaign adviser.
Kris, a Justice Department veteran who served under the George W. Bush and Obama administrations, was selected from among five amicus counsel who are occasionally called on to advance privacy and other interests as a potential check against the government in proceedings at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Now a founding partner at the Seattle-based firm Culpepper Partners, Kris in 2006 publicly criticized the George W. Bush administration's legal justifications for warrantless domestic wiretapping. At the time, Kris was an in-house lawyer at Time Warner Inc.
Kris' latest assignment on the FISA court came as the Justice Department submitted a brief and declaration from FBI Director Christopher Wray that detailed planned overhauls—including additional oversight, new training and "enhanced communication"—to ensure the accuracy and fairness of future surveillance applications.
In a report last month, the Justice Department's inspector general documented numerous examples of misconduct in the FBI's preparation of applications to wiretap the former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page. The inspector general, Michael Horowitz, found the FBI withheld exculpatory information about Page and made misleading statements about his past relationship with a U.S. government agency, detailing 17 omissions and significant errors in surveillance applications.
In the immediate aftermath of the report, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia, then the presiding judge of the surveillance court, rebuked the FBI's conduct as "antithetical to the heightened duty of candor" required in the surveillance application. Collyer ordered the Justice Department to provide the court, by Friday, an outline about what steps have been taken, and will be taken, to ensure filings with the surveillance court are complete and accurate.
In January, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia succeeded Collyer, who stepped down as the surveillance court's presiding judge nine weeks earlier than expected for health reasons. Boasberg's appointment of Kris marked one of his first moves as the surveillance court's presiding judge.
In the submission Friday, Wray outlined reforms designed to bring added accountability to the surveillance application process, and more broadly to how federal agents conduct national security investigations.
"The FBI has the utmost respect for this court, and deeply regrets the errors and omissions identified by the [Justice Department inspector general]," Wray wrote. The inspector's report, he said, described conduct "that is unacceptable and unrepresentative of the FBI as an institution.
"FISA is an indispensable tool in national security investigations, and in recognition of our duty of candor to the court and our responsibilities to the American people, the FBI is committed to working with the court and DOJ to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the FISA process," he wrote.
Among other steps, Wray said the bureau would begin teaching a "case study" based on the Justice Department inspector general's findings and develop new training to ensure the surveillance court is "apprised of all information in the FBI's holdings at the time of an application that would be relevant to a determination of probable cause."
"Critically, the FBI must also balance the implementation of these actions with its ongoing responsibility to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States, during a time of ever-present threats to our national security," Wray said. "The leadership of the FBI has devoted—and will continue to devote—a substantial amount of time, thought and effort to striking this balance, while paying scrupulous attention to its duty of candor to the court and maintaining the trust of the American people."
Read the Justice Department's Jan. 10 filing in the FISA court below:
||
Read more:
At Surveillance Court, Changing of the Guard as DOJ Faces Renewed Scrutiny
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readMassachusetts Federal Judge F. Dennis Saylor to Take Senior Status
What Judicial Nominations Could Look Like Under a President Harris or Trump
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250