Surveillance Court Picks Ex-DOJ Leader David Kris to Review FBI Reforms
"The FBI is committed to working with the court and DOJ to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the FISA process," FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in a declaration Friday.
January 10, 2020 at 07:32 PM
5 minute read
A secretive federal court in Washington on Friday appointed David Kris, a former Obama-era national security leader at the Justice Department, to review changes the FBI has proposed to its surveillance application process in the aftermath of an inspector general report that exposed misconduct in the bureau's handling of applications related to the monitoring of a Trump campaign adviser.
Kris, a Justice Department veteran who served under the George W. Bush and Obama administrations, was selected from among five amicus counsel who are occasionally called on to advance privacy and other interests as a potential check against the government in proceedings at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Now a founding partner at the Seattle-based firm Culpepper Partners, Kris in 2006 publicly criticized the George W. Bush administration's legal justifications for warrantless domestic wiretapping. At the time, Kris was an in-house lawyer at Time Warner Inc.
Kris' latest assignment on the FISA court came as the Justice Department submitted a brief and declaration from FBI Director Christopher Wray that detailed planned overhauls—including additional oversight, new training and "enhanced communication"—to ensure the accuracy and fairness of future surveillance applications.
In a report last month, the Justice Department's inspector general documented numerous examples of misconduct in the FBI's preparation of applications to wiretap the former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page. The inspector general, Michael Horowitz, found the FBI withheld exculpatory information about Page and made misleading statements about his past relationship with a U.S. government agency, detailing 17 omissions and significant errors in surveillance applications.
In the immediate aftermath of the report, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia, then the presiding judge of the surveillance court, rebuked the FBI's conduct as "antithetical to the heightened duty of candor" required in the surveillance application. Collyer ordered the Justice Department to provide the court, by Friday, an outline about what steps have been taken, and will be taken, to ensure filings with the surveillance court are complete and accurate.
In January, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia succeeded Collyer, who stepped down as the surveillance court's presiding judge nine weeks earlier than expected for health reasons. Boasberg's appointment of Kris marked one of his first moves as the surveillance court's presiding judge.
In the submission Friday, Wray outlined reforms designed to bring added accountability to the surveillance application process, and more broadly to how federal agents conduct national security investigations.
"The FBI has the utmost respect for this court, and deeply regrets the errors and omissions identified by the [Justice Department inspector general]," Wray wrote. The inspector's report, he said, described conduct "that is unacceptable and unrepresentative of the FBI as an institution.
"FISA is an indispensable tool in national security investigations, and in recognition of our duty of candor to the court and our responsibilities to the American people, the FBI is committed to working with the court and DOJ to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the FISA process," he wrote.
Among other steps, Wray said the bureau would begin teaching a "case study" based on the Justice Department inspector general's findings and develop new training to ensure the surveillance court is "apprised of all information in the FBI's holdings at the time of an application that would be relevant to a determination of probable cause."
"Critically, the FBI must also balance the implementation of these actions with its ongoing responsibility to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States, during a time of ever-present threats to our national security," Wray said. "The leadership of the FBI has devoted—and will continue to devote—a substantial amount of time, thought and effort to striking this balance, while paying scrupulous attention to its duty of candor to the court and maintaining the trust of the American people."
Read the Justice Department's Jan. 10 filing in the FISA court below:
||
Read more:
At Surveillance Court, Changing of the Guard as DOJ Faces Renewed Scrutiny
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readPentagon Settles Suit Seeking to Clear Records of Service Members Discharged for Being LGBTQ
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250