Judge Links Fate of House's Bid for Trump Tax Returns to DC Circuit Ruling on McGahn
It's not exactly clear why U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden is linking the two cases, although standing played a role in the D.C. Circuit arguments over McGahn's testimony.
January 14, 2020 at 05:00 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday abruptly halted the House's lawsuit seeking President Donald Trump's federal tax returns pending an appeals court ruling on whether former White House counsel Don McGahn can be compelled to testify.
U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden of the District of Columbia at 2:54 p.m. Tuesday scheduled a phone conference in the case for 3 p.m. Shortly afterward, an order was issued saying the case will be stayed until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issues its decision in the McGahn case.
The three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit heard arguments in that case Jan. 3. The appellate court is scheduled to release opinions Friday, although it's unclear when a ruling will be made.
Why McFadden, who Trump appointed to the bench in 2017, is concerned about the McGahn case is currently only known to the judge and lawyers on the call.
Both the McGahn and tax returns lawsuits seek to enforce congressional subpoenas for information relating to the president, but there are few other similarities between the two cases.
House lawyers say McGahn was privy to potential acts of obstruction of justice by Trump, as laid out in special counsel Robert Mueller's report. Democrats want his testimony for the Senate's impeachment trial, set to begin in earnest next week, and haven't ruled out the possibility of the testimony being used for additional articles of impeachment against the president.
The House Ways & Means Committee, which is behind the Trump tax returns lawsuit, requested the documents last year under a provision in the tax code that allows the committee to request returns from the IRS.
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin denied that request, as well as a subpoena for the returns, saying they lacked a "legitimate legislative purpose." The committee went to court shortly after that.
McFadden has wrestled in the past over other House lawsuits. He dismissed lawmakers' lawsuit last year over Trump's diversion of military funds for a border wall, saying he didn't believe the House had standing to sue.
And after Trump's personal attorneys moved for McFadden to hear their lawsuit challenging a New York law that would let lawmakers access Trump's state returns, the judge found that it wasn't related to the House suit seeking the president's federal returns and didn't belong in his court.
University of Iowa law professor Andy Grewal said McFadden's order "seems like the prudent course."
"Whether the Ways & Means Committee has standing to sue the IRS is an open question, and the McGahn case may shed light on it," he tweeted.
McFadden heard oral arguments in the House tax returns case in November, during which he indicated he thought the House did have standing to sue.
But standing remained a major topic during the D.C. Circuit's arguments over McGahn's testimony earlier this month.
Justice Department attorney Hashim Mooppan told the judges that they should stay out of the McGahn lawsuit, now that the House has impeached Trump. Mooppan said a court ruling could be viewed as interfering in the impeachment process and could ultimately undermine Americans' trust in the federal judiciary.
Judge Thomas Griffith, who previously worked in the Senate, also suggested during the arguments the House had tools other than going to court to compel McGahn's testimony.
"Cut the appropriations, get the Senate to stop confirming judges," Griffith said. "You're not without remedy here."
House attorney Megan Barbero, a former Justice Department lawyer, argued that even if there are political issues involved in the case, "it is the duty of the court in a case that is otherwise justiciable … to say what the law is."
Read more:
Who Is Trevor McFadden? Meet the Judge Assigned the Trump Tax Returns Case
DOJ Tells 'Unelected and Unaccountable' Judges to Stay Out of Fight for McGahn Testimony
A Judge Didn't Sound Eager to Throw Out House Suit Seeking Trump Tax Returns
DOJ's Legal Counsel Office Picks Up Former US House Lawyer
READ: US House Asks Judge to Force Disclosure of Trump's Taxes
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250