Sentencing of Iranian Agents in DC Touches on Global Tension
On Wednesday, the subject of the FBI's surveillance, Ahmadreza Doostdar, was sentenced to more than three years in prison for serving as an illegal agent of Iran, concluding a prosecution in Washington that addressed the global tensions between the U.S. and Iran.
January 15, 2020 at 06:36 PM
5 minute read
He was observed walking slowly, reviewing his surroundings and looking into cars and the reflection of store windows. He took circuitous routes to meetings, changing his clothes beforehand, employing an approach that bore hallmarks of "intelligence tradecraft," an FBI agent wrote in 2018.
On Wednesday, the subject of the FBI's surveillance, Ahmadreza Doostdar, was sentenced to more than three years in prison for serving as an illegal agent of Iran, concluding a prosecution in Washington that addressed the global tensions between the U.S. and Iran.
Doostdar, a dual Iranian-U.S. citizen, was charged in August 2018 with surveilling members of Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, or MEK, a group that advocates for the overthrow of the Iranian government. Another Iranian citizen, Majid Ghorbani, was also charged with serving as an illegal agent of Iran in connection with the covert surveillance.
Both men pleaded guilty last year, with Doostdar admitting to charges that he served as an agent of Iran without notifying the U.S. attorney general. Ghorbani, who pleaded guilty to a single charge of providing services to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions, was sentenced Wednesday to 30 months in prison.
In a two-hour hearing before U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman of the District of Columbia, prosecutor Jocelyn Ballantine said Doostdar had recruited Ghorbani to photograph and identify MEK members based in the U.S., with the goal of disrupting the group. Ballantine said the Iranian government has a record of "horrible acts of violence" against MEK, adding that the photographs provided information that could help Iran target the group's members.
"These are not just pictures," she said.
While acknowledging his methods were unsophisticated in some respects, Ballantine said Doostdar used code names and a payphone to communicate with Ghorbani, a "tactic he had been taught by the Iranian intelligence service," she said.
The head of DOJ's national security division, John Demers, said in a statement that the "case illustrates Iran's targeting of Americans in the United States in order to silence those who oppose the Iranian regime or otherwise further its goals." The prosecutions, Demers said, "should serve as a reminder to anyone here working covertly for Iran that the American law enforcement will pursue you to protect this country, its citizens and the First Amendment principles upon which it was founded."
"The sentences in this case illustrate the high cost to those who act as agents of the Iranian government in the United States or provide services that benefit the government of Iran, especially when those activities target the free speech and peaceful assembly rights of people in the United States," Jessie Liu, the U.S. attorney for D.C., said in a statement.
Doostdar's sentencing came just weeks after a U.S. drone strike in Iraq killed Qassim Soleimani, a major general in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who commanded Iran's elite security and intelligence forces. Iran later launched missiles at air bases in Iraq housing U.S. troops, an attack that resulted in no American casualties, prompting President Donald Trump to declare last week that Iran appears to be "standing down."
In a brief statement, Doostdar told the judge: "I just wanted to apologize for what I've done, especially to the court and especially to my family."
In the buildup to Doostdar's sentencing, his defense team cautioned against the "dangers of mixing politics—especially foreign policy politics—with the criminal justice system" in the case. Urging Friedman to "block out all the geopolitical madness," Doostdar's defense lawyers noted that his sentencing was set to "take place 12 days after President Trump personally issued an executive drone-strike order to assassinate" Soleimani.
In court Wednesday, Ballantine and Doostdar's lead defense lawyer, Thomas Durkin, debated whether the sentence should be influenced by the desire to deter Iran from conducting surveillance in the U.S. Ballantine argued that Iran has exploited dual citizens, like Doostdar, for intelligence.
"It is important to deter the government of Iran," she said.
Friedman appeared skeptical of that argument, questioning whether a stiff sentence for Doostdar would chill the Iranian government "from doing what they want to do." His 38-month sentence for Doostdar fell nearly two years below what prosecutors recommended: A prison term of 57 and 71 months. For Ghorbani, prosecutors recommended a sentence between 46 and 57 months. For both men, prosecutors recommended a prison term "at or near the high end" of the range.
Durkin, a Chicago-based lawyer who has represented several accused Islamic State supporters, sought to minimize Doostdar's role, describing him as a bit of a "goof" who "hasn't exactly made his mark on the world."
"I get that geopolitics are important," he said. "But he is not a major geopolitical player."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250