Senior DOJ Political Appointee Apologizes to Court After Bar License Lapsed
"I was not aware of the lapse due to nonpayment of dues and did not intend to mislead the court," Jeffrey Clark, head of the DOJ's environment and natural resources division, told a Washington judge. The former Kirkland & Ellis partner said he quickly resolved the issue.
January 27, 2020 at 02:13 PM
5 minute read
Jeffrey Clark, appearing at his confirmation hearing in 2017. Credit: Senate Judiciary
A top U.S. Justice Department lawyer apologized to a federal judge on Monday for allowing his bar license to lapse as his name appeared on filings in a case challenging the Trump administration's move to subvert state regulations for vehicle emissions.
In a letter, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey B. Clark said he discovered Dec. 9 that his license to practice law in Washington had been placed on "inactive status" in early October "for inadvertent non-payment of that year's dues."
Clark, the Senate-confirmed head of the Justice Department's environment and natural resources division, said he promptly addressed his lapsed bar license, paying the necessary dues along with a $280 penalty.
His letter to the court marked a rare court filing from a senior Justice Department leader. Clark, formerly a partner at Kirkland & Ellis in Washington, told the court he "also reported the dues issue to Justice Department authorities." The Justice Department's rules require lawyers to "immediately self-report to [Office of Professional Responsibility] any lapse in active bar membership during department employment." The professional responsibility office, widely known as at OPR, oversees DOJ attorney conduct matters.
"Upon further consultation with the relevant department office, I determined to bring the matter to the court's attention and I followed its advice on the form of this letter: Specifically, if because my name appeared on a filing I implicitly represented that my D.C. Bar license was active and was authorized to represent the United States at that time (Department attorneys must maintain an active state-bar license), I wish to correct any such implicit representation and extend my sincere apology," Clark wrote. "I was not aware of the lapse due to nonpayment of dues and did not intend to mislead the court."
Clark did not indicate how he learned his bar license had lapsed, and he was not immediately reached for comment Monday. Kirkland & Ellis "handled paying" his bar dues from 2006 until 2018, he wrote.
"The D.C. Bar did not have my correct address and I received no mail forwarded to me from my prior private law firm," Clark told U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the District of Columbia. Clark further stated that Kirkland & Ellis moved to a new address in 2019. D.C. bar rules say lawyers need to update their address within 30 days of any change.
Clark's name appeared on filings the Justice Department made between October and early December in defense of the Trump administration's so-called "preemption regulation," a proposed nationwide fuel economy and emission standard for automobiles and light-duty trucks. The California Attorney General's Office, joined by more than 20 states and the District of Columbia, sued in November to block the regulation, arguing that it threatened to undercut more stringent state regulations designed to protect public health.
The California Attorney General's Office was not immediately reached for comment on Clark's letter.
Recent annual OPR reports revealed instances where DOJ lawyers self-reported lapses in their bar license. In one instance, the unidentified lawyer was newly licensed "and he received no written or electronic notice from the state bar regarding the annual registration fee." OPR stated in a report: "In addition, immediately upon learning of his suspension, he paid the annual registration fee, and he was reinstated. OPR concluded that further investigation was not likely to result in a finding of professional misconduct."
In another case, OPR reported: "Given the circumstances and the limited time period of the suspension, and because the DOJ attorney's bar license had not previously been suspended, QPR concluded that further investigation was unlikely to result in a finding of professional misconduct. Accordingly, QPR closed its inquiry in the matter."
![Kirkland & Ellis](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2018/08/Kirkland-Ellis-Article-201808212104.jpg)
Clark had been at Kirkland & Ellis—formerly the home to many Trump-era DOJ leaders, including U.S. Attorney General William Barr—from 2005 until his October 2018 confirmation as the assistant attorney in charge of the Justice Department's environmental division.
His clients at Kirkland & Ellis included General Motors, Mitsubishi Motors Corp., Volkswagen Group of America and Hitachi Ltd. Earlier, Clark was an associate at Kirkland from 1996 to 2001. His financial disclosure showed $963,000 in income from Kirkland in 2016 and 2017.
Clark's confirmation to lead the DOJ's environmental team marked a return to the division. He served in the division from 2001 to 2005 as a deputy assistant attorney general under the leadership of then-Attorney General John Ashcroft.
>> Read Clark's letter to the court Monday:
Read more:
'Presidents Are Not Kings': Judge Jackson's Memorable Lines in McGahn Order
William Barr Fills Front Office With Trump White House Lawyers
Women Lawyers' Group Stands Up for Jessie Liu After DOJ Nomination Scuttled
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued? ‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2023/11/15438u-767x633-9.jpg)
‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
![DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2024/08/Federal-Bureau-Investigation-FBI-2016-05-767x633.jpg)
DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
3 minute read![Sylvia Favretto Elevated to Mysten Labs’ General Counsel Sylvia Favretto Elevated to Mysten Labs’ General Counsel](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1d/67/c59c4fa44ff7b3979d2248f6841b/sylvia-favretto-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250