February Editor's Note - Will 'June Medical Services' Spell Abortion's End?
Editor-in-Chief Lisa Helem shares highlights from the NLJ's February magazine, including a cover story on the major U.S. Supreme Court case June Medical Services v. Gee and an interview with Michael Dreeben, former deputy solicitor general of the United States.
January 30, 2020 at 10:00 AM
2 minute read
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear June Medical Services v. Gee in March and Marcia Coyle reports in our February cover story on why the case, which challenges Louisiana's abortion law, could "test the views of its two newest justices and challenge the high court's respect for its prior abortion decisions." As some high court observers note, the case could also potentially spell the beginning of the end of the constitutional right to an abortion, Coyle reports. Check out her cover story for more.
In a companion piece, Coyle also highlights some of the key Supreme Court cases—on everything from immigration to employment rights—that have been argued thus far in the 2019-2020 term.
Speaking of high court arguments, Dan Packel chats with someone who has 105 of those under his belt, Michael Dreeben, the well-regarded former deputy solicitor general of the United States.
Dreeben joined O'Melveny & Myers in January as an appellate and white-collar partner, after spending a semester as a distinguished lecturer in government at Georgetown University Law Center. He contrasts his experiences trying to persuade nine justices and keeping law students engaged. He also explains how teaching informs his advocacy.
Dreeben also recounts three Supreme Court cases that he looks back on with particular pride. Check out this must-read Q&A in "One on One: Conversations with Newsmakers."
Next, Ropes & Gray lawyers Valerie Bonham and Mark Barnes write that U.S. universities and their researchers are facing more pressure to address risks that foreign governments are using research collaborations to gain scientific advantage at the expense of U.S. national security interests.
Lastly, take a gander at the latest legal moves from around the globe in "Movers," compiled by Pearl Wu.
As always, we love hearing from you! Email me at the address below or reach out on twitter. Thanks for reading!
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLJ December/January Editor's Note: What's Driving White Collar Defense and Antitrust Anxieties
2 minute readApril Editor's Note: Gearing up for Regulatory Action & Why Judges Leave the Bench
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 2Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 3Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 4People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 5How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250