Carter Page Suit Puts Fresh Spotlight on Perkins Coie, Marc Elias Over Trump 'Dossier'
A Chicago lawsuit marks the second time Page has tried to sue the DNC, Perkins Coie and two of the firm's partners, Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann.
January 31, 2020 at 01:06 PM
5 minute read
Carter Page, who served as an informal foreign policy adviser to President Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, filed a federal lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie and two of the law firm's partners Thursday, accusing them of destroying "his once-private life."
Perkins Coie's close relationship to the DNC, and its role in hiring private investigation firm Fusion GPS to undertake opposition research on Trump, has made the firm an unlikely household name and frequent conservative punching bag since the election. In his lawsuit, Page claims the DNC, Perkins Coie and its partners—political law practice chair Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann—defamed him through the so-called "Steele dossier" produced by Fusion GPS.
The dossier stated that the Russian government and its president, Vladimir Putin, actively favored Trump's election over Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. Page, who was referenced multiple times in the dossier, alleged it was "replete with falsehoods" as it portrayed him as being a Russian agent. The dossier was shared with multiple reporters, Page alleged.
"The defendants' wrongful actions convinced many Americans that Dr. Page is a traitor to the United States, and as a result he has received—and continues to receive—multiple death threats. Dr. Page's businesses have suffered greatly from the false, malicious information spread by defendants," Page said in his lawsuit, filed in Chicago.
Page alleged the defendants used the false information within the dossier to push the U.S. Justice Department and the FBI to surveil him. The DOJ's internal watchdog last month found that the FBI mishandled its surveillance of Page, finding 17 "significant errors or other omissions" in the applications the agency submitted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
However, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz said the FBI's decision to investigate potential Russian ties to the Trump campaign and monitor Page was justified, with no evidence of "political bias or improper motivation."
Page alleged the defendants' defamatory statements led to him losing out on business opportunities in Kazakhstan and the Middle East. Two entities Page runs, Global Energy Capital LLC and Global Natural Gas Ventures LLC, are co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
In his federal complaint, Page alleged six counts against all defendants, including defamation, false light, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and conspiracy.
The Chicago lawsuit marks the second time Page has tried to sue the DNC, Perkins Coie, Elias and Sussmann. He filed a lawsuit on his own in the Western District of Oklahoma in October 2018. U.S. District Judge Joe Heaton dismissed that suit in January 2019 after finding Page failed to show why this lawsuit should proceed in Oklahoma.
"Carter Page's baseless claims are recycled from his previous lawsuit, which was dismissed last year," said DNC deputy communications director Adrienne Watson in a statement.
A Perkins Coie spokesperson expressed similar sentiments in his own statement: "This complaint recycles allegations by Carter Page that were dismissed by a federal judge in Oklahoma last year, and we expect that this latest lawsuit will likewise be dismissed."
This time around, Page is represented by lawyers from Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht's Los Angeles office and Rathje Woodward, a law firm located in the Chicagoland suburb of Wheaton, Illinois.
In a press release, John Pierce, the firm's global managing partner and one of Page's lawyers, described the lawsuit as being a "first salvo" against people who tried to destroy Page's life.
"Today, Pierce Bainbridge and Dr. Page begin a campaign to restore Dr. Page's name and hold those who targeted him accountable," Pierce said. "Most importantly, this is a first step to ensure that the full extent of the FISA abuse that has occurred during the last few years is exposed and remedied. Defendants and those they worked with inside the federal government did not and will not succeed in making America a surveillance state."
Although the DNC, Elias and Sussman are based in Washington, D.C.—and Perkins Coie is headquartered in Seattle—Page argues Chicago was the proper venue for the lawsuit. When Barack Obama, a former U.S. senator from Illinois, was president, he moved the DNC's main operations to the Windy City, establishing jurisdiction, Page asserts.
He also alleged that the relationship DNC, Perkins Coie and Elias had with Fusion GPS was "orchestrated" in the law firm's Chicago office and that at least one key legal decision was made by an unnamed senior lawyer there.
Perkins Coie in 2019 reported having 127 lawyers in its Chicago office, according to ALM Intelligence.
|Read More
'Serious Performance Failures,' But No Anti-Trump Bias: Read the DOJ Watchdog's Report
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250