Law Firms Are Failing Work-Life Balance in the March for Gender Equality, Ginsburg Says
"Unconscious bias" and work-life balance remain the biggest obstacles for women, regardless of their profession, the justice said.
January 31, 2020 at 12:52 PM
3 minute read
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Thursday said work-life balance remains elusive in achieving gender equality, and she blamed "firms" that "have not yet been sufficiently accommodating."
Ginsburg, after describing the dearth of assistance for female lawyers with children when she graduated from law school, told the audience, "I thought in the electronic age it would be easier to overcome because if you're a lawyer, for example, you have the entire law library at your fingertips wherever you are. But firms have not yet been sufficiently accommodating."
The justice's comments, made in an interview after a ceremony in which she received the LBJ Liberty & Justice for All Award, came against a backdrop of a recent spate of lawsuits against major law firms alleging gender discrimination. They also followed just hours after three states went to federal court to enforce ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.
"We have come a very long way," Ginsburg said in an interview with Mark Updegrove, president and CEO of the LBJ Foundation. "In the beginning of the '70s, the statutes, the U.S. Code, were riddled with gender-based differentials. My job was to get to court to show that all these differentials did not operate benignly in women's favor and that was the mission—to get rid of all the explicit gender-based discrimination written into the law. That job was done in the space of 10 years."
The two major obstacles remaining, she said, are "unconscious bias" and work-life balance.
The LBJ Liberty & Justice for All Award, according to the foundation, honors those who carry on President Lyndon B. Johnson's legacy, regardless of party affiliation, personifying the mission he defined as the country's most basic: "to right wrong, to do justice, to serve man."
During the evening event, Ginsburg was feted with a performance by singer-songwriter James Taylor, readings from her opinions by television and film stars Holland Taylor, Constance Wu and Sunny Hostin, and a speech by former LBJ speechwriter-journalist Bill Moyers.
When asked what one case she would like history to associate with her, Ginsburg noted two dissenting opinions, one in the voting rights case, Shelby County, Ala. v. Holder and the fair pay act case, Lilly Ledbetter v. Goodyear. For her majority opinions, she pointed to the gender discrimination case involving the Virginia Military Institute: Virginia v. United States.
On what accomplishment has given her the greatest pride, Ginsburg said she was "lucky enough" to be part of the revived feminist movement. In the '70s, she noted there was a sea change in the way people were living.
"If you wanted to give your children opportunities, you needed a second income," said the justice. "I saw the law catching up to a larger change already occurring in society. I consider myself tremendously fortunate to have been alive and a lawyer when society finally was ready to recognize women as equal in stature to men."
When asked what her greatest fear for the country was, Ginsburg replied the "high degree of polarization" in the nation. "That is the fear that this polarization will continue, and my greatest hope is that it will end."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250