Boston Judge Hands Novo Nordisk Loss in Noncompete Feud With Rival
Novo Nordisk, represented by lawyers from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, is locked in a dispute with BioMarin Pharmaceutical, represented by Jones Day, in courts in Massachusetts, Texas, New York and California. A Boston judge on Wednesday declined to issue a temporary restraining order.
February 05, 2020 at 03:22 PM
5 minute read
Updated at 5:11 p.m.
A Boston federal trial judge on Wednesday refused to immediately stop a former Novo Nordisk Inc. employee from working at a rival company, a defeat for the pharmaceutical giant as it fights in courts across the country to enforce noncompete agreements amid a series of departures.
Novo Nordisk, represented by lawyers from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, is locked in a dispute with California-based rival BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. in courts in Massachusetts, Texas, New York and California. Last month, a Texas judge declined to issue a temporary restraining order against a former Novo Nordisk employee.
Morgan Lewis attorneys have accused BioMarin of leading a campaign to "systematically raid Novo Nordisk's hemophilia sales force to launch BioMarin's directly-competitive hemophilia therapies." Former Novo Nordisk employees in some cases are the plaintiffs, contesting the validity of workplace agreements that restrict jumping to competing companies.
"It is not clear that Novo and BioMarin are competitors given the different types of treatment each offers to hemophilia patients and the fact that use of the therapies is not mutually exclusive," U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts said in her order Wednesday denying both a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.
Burroughs also noted that former Novo Nordisk sales official Thomas Russomano's employment "was consistently unstable as his position was eliminated in both 2016 and 2018, and his territory shifted repeatedly." The judge determined the noncompete provisions of a 2016 agreement were no longer in effect.
Siobhan Mee and Sarah Butson of Morgan Lewis represent Novo Nordisk in the Massachusetts case. Mee, who leads the firm's labor and employment team in the Boston office, was not immediately reached for comment.
Jones Day represents the former employee, Russomano, a sales official who left Novo Nordisk in January. Jones Day partner Christopher Morrison, arguing for Russomano, said his client did not have a noncompete obligation to Novo Nordisk.
"Novo has no legitimate interests to protect in this case. As a life-long hemophilia patient, [Russomano] carried knowledge about the hemophilia patient community with him to Novo and he is entitled to carry it out," Morrison told the court.
Russomano, the Morgan Lewis lawyers argued recently, "will necessarily and inevitably use and disclose his confidential Information about Novo Nordisk's hemophilia business, and leverage the customer and stakeholder relationships he developed at Novo Nordisk on behalf of BioMarin, thereby wrongfully damaging Novo Nordisk's competitive advantage and customer goodwill."
A representative from Novo Nordisk were not immediately reached for comment Wednesday afternoon.
BioMarin said in a statement:
"We appreciate the court's thoughtful review and recognizing that the non-compete is not enforceable against our employee. BioMarin is committed to competing fairly in the market, defending our employees, and working with them to deliver breakthrough therapies to the international Hemophilia community. We will continue to challenge any future inappropriate use of non-compete agreements to stifle innovation and inhibit the development and commercialization of important advancements like gene therapy."
In September, Novo Nordisk sued a former employee and BioMarin in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. BioMarin's time to respond to the complaint was put on hold in mid-January. Novo Nordisk has a deadline of Feb. 14 to file an amended complaint or otherwise update the court on the company's plans.
"Ongoing discussions between plaintiff Novo Nordisk and defendant BioMarin aimed at resolving this matter have reached an apparent impasse, and continuation of the litigation appears necessary," the lawyers for the two sides told the court Jan. 16.
On Jan. 24, a Texas federal district judge denied Novo Nordisk's request for a temporary restraining order. In that case, a former employee named Julie Golla sued Novo Nordisk. Houston-based Jones Day partner Joanne Bush represents BioMarin and Golla.
"Novo has not set forth any evidence that it will be harmed," Bush said in a court filing last month. "Golla diligently returned all her company materials and Novo has only made vague statements about the information it claims is at risk."
The presiding trial judge, Senior U.S. District Judge David Hittner of the Southern District of Texas, deferred ruling on Novo Nordisk's request for a preliminary injunction until after a hearing. The lawyers in the case have proposed a March 4 hearing.
This report was updated with comment from BioMarin.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
5 minute read'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250